The New Brutalism & America’s Racist Killing Fields by Henry Giroux

The New Brutalism and the Racist Killing Fields in America:
The Death of Sandra Bland
 
by      Henry A. Giroux
 

On July 9, soon after Sandra Bland, a 28-year-old African-American woman, moved to Texas from Naperville, Illinois to take a new job as a college outreach officer at her alma mater, Prairie View A&M, she was pulled over by the police for failing to signal while making a lane change. What followed has become all too common and illustrates the ever increasing rise in domestic terrorism in the United States.

How to Make July 3-5 a Celebration of Interdependence

Interdependence Day Celebration  
Transforming July 4th into an event affirming the value of everyone on earth and affirming our interdependence with them and with the earth itself

 

Faced with July 4th celebrations that are focused on militarism, ultra-nationalism, and “bombs bursting in air,” many American families who do not share those values turn July 4th into another summer holiday focused on picnics, sports and fireworks while doing their best to avoid the dominant rhetoric and bombast.  

We in the Network of Spiritual Progressives believe that this is a net loss. There is much worth celebrating in American history that deserves attention on July 4th, though it is rarely the focus of the public events.  

We also acknowledge that in the 21st century there is a pressing need to develop a new kind of consciousness—a recognition of the interdependence of everyone on the planet.  A new (and this time, nonviolent) revolution is necessary—one in which our actions reflect a realization that our well-being depends  on the well-being of everyone else on the planet and of the planet itself.  

We’ve designed the following material as a possible guide for individual families or for public celebrations that share the values we hold.

A very different analysis of the Greek financial crisis

Syriza:  Plunder, Pillage and Prostration
James Petras
Introduction

Greece has been in the headlines of the world’s financial press for the past five months, as a newly elected leftist party, ‘Syriza’, which ostensibly opposes so-called ‘austerity measures’, faces off against the “Troika” (International Monetary Fund, the European Commission and European Central Bank). Early on, the Syriza leadership, headed by Alexis Tsipras, adopted several strategic positions with fatal consequences – in terms of implementing their electoral promises to raise living standards, end vassalage to the ‘Troika’ and pursue an independent foreign policy. I will proceed by outlining the initial systemic failures of Syriza and the subsequent concessions further eroding Greek living standards. Winning Elections and Surrendering Power

The North American and European Left celebrated Syriza’s election victory as a break with neo-liberal austerity programs and the launch of a radical alternative, which would implement popular initiatives for basic social changes, including measures generating employment, restoring pensions, reversing privatizations, reordering government priorities and favoring payments to employees over foreign banks.  The “evidence” for the radical reform agenda was contained in the ‘Thessaloniki Manifesto’ which Syriza promised to be the program guiding their newly elected officials. However, prior to, and immediately after being elected, Syriza leaders adopted three basic decisions precluding any basic changes: Indeed, these decisions set it on a reactionary course.

A Path to End Racism

A Path to Defeat Racism

by Rabbi Michael Lerner and Cat Zavis

Racism is the demeaning of an entire group of people and refusing to see them as fully human in the way we see ourselves and those we deem to be “like” us. When we fail to see the “other’s” humanity, we ascribe to all of them ugly characteristics that somehow justify treating them with less honor and less generosity and less dignity than we would with others who are part of the groups we do see as fundamentally like us. From this place of separation we justify denying the “other” equal rights, benefits and caring that all human beings deserve. Racism in the U.S. has a long history. It was foundational to US expansion throughout the North American continent, allowing white people to justify to themselves genocidal policies toward Native Americans, to allow slavery and to incorporate into our Constitution a provision that would count African slaves as 3/5 of a human being so that Southern States would have higher representation in the Congress though racists both north and south didn’t think of them as human beings at all.

Love Wins! Lessons from the Movement for Marriage Equality

By Cat J. Zavis

Wow. For a brief moment I am feeling such gratitude for our Supreme Court—well, at least for five justices of the court! This is a time to celebrate. Gay and lesbian couples are finally recognized for their commitment to love their partners just as any heterosexual couple does. What an amazing moment of honoring and respecting people who choose love and commitment.

The Path to Defeat Racism

Racism is the demeaning of an entire group of people and refusal to see them as fully human in the way we see ourselves and those we deem to be “like” us. When we fail to see the humanity of the “other,” we ascribe to them ugly characteristics that somehow justify treating them with less honor and less generosity than we would others who are part of the groups we do see as fundamentally like us. From this place of separation we justify denying the “other” equal rights, benefits, and caring that all human beings deserve. Racism in the United States has a long history. It was foundational to U.S. expansion throughout the North American continent, allowing white people to justify to themselves genocidal policies toward Native Americans, to allow slavery, and to incorporate into our Constitution a provision that would count African slaves as three-fifths of a human being so that Southern States would have higher representation in the Congress, though racists both North and South didn’t think of them as human beings at all.

Psychology and the Prevention of War Trauma

Journal for Social Action in Counseling and Psychology, 2015 ( in press)

Psychology and the Prevention of War Trauma: An Article Rejected by American Psychologist
by
 

                                    Marc Pilisuk and Ines-Lena Mahr [i]

Author Note

 

Marc Pilisuk, emeritus professor, University of California; faculty, Saybrook University. He is a past President of the Society for the Study of Peace, Conflict and Violence. His awards for teaching, research, and action in peace, justice and transformative change include the 2011 Howard Zinn award from the Peace and Justice Studies Association.  

Ines-Lena Mahr completed her undergraduate degree in Liberal Arts and Science at the University College Maastricht in the Netherlands, focusing on Psychology and International Relations. In Fall, 2013, she will start the Masters programme in Social and Cultural Psychology at the London School of Economics.

Responding to Michael Dyson’s Attack on Cornel West

APRIL 27, 2015

Rethinking Michael Eric Dyson’s Attack on Cornel West
The Perils of Being a Public Intellectual
by HENRY A. GIROUX

Michael Eric Dyson has launched in the New Republic a bitter attack on Cornel West.[1] At the heart of Dyson’s critique is a discourse that engages in character assassination but not before he makes clear what is really at stake in his attack. Dyson resents West’s critique of Obama’s domestic and foreign policies. But rather than judiciously and analytically weigh such criticisms, hardly confined to West, he positions him as a spurned lover, angry and bitter because among other things, he did not get a ticket to Obama’s 2008 inauguration. Dyson expands his critique by claiming that West is not a scholar, who has lived up to the standards of decent scholarship, bolstering his case by quoting among others, Larry Summers, the irrepressible apostle of neoliberalism and unbridled finance capital. It never occurs to Dyson that Summers’ critique of West may be more political than anything else.

Only a sweeping Constitutional Amendment Can Save the Environment–Here IT IS

A Real Solution to Environmental Sustainability

by Rabbi Michael Lerner

 

Only a sweeping Constitutional amendment can save us from a global environmental disaster beyond our imagination. It’s time to sweep aside all the illusions:

* The illusion that the national environmental organizations have a secret plan to save the environment but just haven’t told us yet. * The illusion that local acts of environmental sanity in a few dozen urban areas will make a dent on the global degradation of the life-support-system of the planet. *  The illusion that “new technologies” will solve the problem. *  The illusion that individual acts of recycling and “conscious consumerism” will change what is being produced.

Human Evil

Evil must be understood as the inability to see the humanity of others. Americans often justify our violence toward others by emphasizing their evil while ignoring our own.

Henry Giroux on Hysterical Authoritarianism: Terrorism, Violence and the Culture of Madness

Editor’s Note:

Henry Giroux’s picture of America presents a society that would be rather depressing if it were the whole picture. What it leaves out is the irrepressible desire of human beings to live in a world of love and generosity, kindness and environmental sanity. While he talks of Americans’ attraction to violence as an entertainment, I think of it more likely as a response to the frustration of their desires for a different kind of world, anger at themselves for allowing themselves to even think about an alternative given the constant preaching of everyone to everyone that one must be “realistic” and accept that the exploitative, materialistic and selfishness oriented social world cannot be changed or transcended, and then relieving that self-punishing anger by externalizing it against societally-sanctioned targets,  namely the “others” who the society finds convenient to disempower and oppress. This othering can be challenged, but only by a movement that does not deal with the American public as hopelessly bamboozled by the existing entertainments, but as themselves suffering and deserving of empathy as a first step toward a process of liberation from the dominant consciousness and opening toward an alternative. That development of a counter-consciousness is precisely the goal of The Network of Spiritual Progressives, and the point of the Global Marshall Plan www.tikkun.org/gmp, the ESRA Environmental and Social Responsibility Amendment www.tikkun.org and the “New Bottom Line”  www.tikkun.org/newsite/yearning-for-a-world-of-love-and-justice-2 is to provide us with concrete ways to raise this new consciousness through struggles that can only be won when people become attracted to the idea of breaking through the repressive consciousness of contemporary political reality and embracing the seemingly utopian visions inherent in the Tikkun/NSP programs. Yet so much of what Giroux points to is true that it is important to read this article, and then re-read this introduction to see where you end up in this discussion.

By Separating Nature from Economics, we have walked blindly into tragedy– by Jeffrey Sachs

By separating nature from economics, we have walked blindly into tragedy

Jeffrey Sachs           March 10, 2015

Recent news brings yet another example of hubris followed by crisis followed by tragedy. The hubris is our ongoing neglect of human-induced climate change, leading to climate disruptions around the world. One of the many climate crises currently under way is the mega-drought in São Paulo, Brazil. The recent tragedy is an epidemic of dengue fever in the city, as mosquitos breed in the makeshift water tanks that have bought in to maintain supply through the drought. Welcome to ‘the age of sustainable development’.

NO, Mr. Netanyahu! We Will NOT Let You Drag the U.S. Into a Proxy War for Israel Against Iran — Sign the NY Times Ad

We invite you to sign and contribute financial support to make this New York Times ad possible (go to tikkun.org/peaceproject to sign and donate to make this ad possible). Would you join us as a signer of the proposed full-page New York Timesad below? If so, please give us your name as you wish it to appear. You may also include a short institutional or organizational affiliation (for identification purposes only). This ad will only be possible if you and others donate generously (please stretch a little) to make it possible. Donate Now.