Editor’s Note:
The comparison of Israel to South Africa has incendiary elements–and caused Jimmy Carter’s very important book to be dismissed without a serious reading. But this piece is from the publisher of the only liberal newspaper in Israel, and has to be taken very very seriously even by those of us who think that the use of the term “apartheid” is counter-productive and obscures the way in which Israeli
policy toward Palestinians is not only different from apartheid, but in some respects far worse in real life terms. Haaretz newspaper is the equivalent to the NY Times for Israel, the one paper that doesn’t focus on sensationalism, Arab hatred, sex, and gossip, but actually bothers to report the news. So its owner Amos Schocken, of the famous family that created Schocken Books, commands our respect, as well as appreciation for having given our previous managing editor Joel Shalit permission to reprint on Tikkun’s website the articles in Ha’aretz.–Rabbi Michael Lerner
The necessary elimination of Israeli democracy
Haaretz publisher and owner Amos Schocken says there is a difference between the apartheid of South Africa and what is happening in Israel and in the territories, but there are also similarities. By Amos Schocken Tags: West Bank Israel settlements Knesset Yitzhak Rabin
Speaking in the Knesset in January 1993, Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin said, “Iran is in the initial stages of an effort to acquire nonconventional capability in general, and nuclear capability in particular. Our assessment is that Iran today has the appropriate manpower and sufficient resources to acquire nuclear arms within 10 years.