Zionists Endorse Palestinian Move at UN

More

Today, Partners for Progressive Israel, an official American-Zionist organization formerly known as Meretz USA, has issued the following statement:

November 27, 2012

Partners for Progressive Israel strongly endorses the application of Palestine to be accorded Non-Member Observer State status at the United Nations and calls on Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu to do so as well.
As a longstanding member of the American Zionist movement and as an organization that traces its roots to the days of Israel’s creation, we regard the Palestinian application as a vital step forward towards a durable, just, comprehensive, negotiated two-state peace, which is the only way to secure Israel’s existence as a democratic, Jewish-majority state.
The recent violence between Israel and Hamas-led Gaza has underscored that any attempt to ignore the Israeli-Palestinian dispute and any effort to indefinitely maintain the status quo of ‘manageable Occupation’ and ‘low-intensity conflict’ – as Israel’s current government seems inclined – is dangerous folly that is certain to exact a growing price in suffering and death on both sides.
Two Palestinian groups are vying for dominance of the Palestinian national movement: The Islamist Hamas, which controls Gaza, condones the targeting of civilians, and does not accept Israel’s fundamental legitimacy. And the Fatah-led PLO, the internationally recognized representative of the Palestinian people, whose leader, Mahmoud Abbas, has endorsed the two-state solution, rejected violence and terrorism, rejected efforts to delegitimize Israel, and is preparing his people for the difficult, but necessary, concessions that a peace agreement will entail.
At this crucial juncture, it is the obligation of the international community, including Israel’s greatest ally, the United States of America, to make sure that the strategy of coexistence and moderation is rewarded, and that the Palestinian people are offered a horizon in which they are able to realize a viable, contiguous, independent state alongside Israel not through guns and bombs, but via the tools of statecraft and diplomacy.
Far from being an act of “diplomatic terror” against Israel (in the words of Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman), the Palestinian application for Observer State status is entirely consistent with the two-state approach supported by the international community and by a majority of Israel’s citizens, and nominally endorsed by Israel’s current government. In particular, we note that the application:

  • Prominently refers to UN Resolution 181 (II) of November 1947, which clearly endorses the existence of an independent “Jewish state” as part of the partition of Mandatory Palestine. This reference constitutes an important step towards accommodating Prime Minister Netanyahu’s demand that Israel be recognized as the expression of Jewish nationhood.
  • Affirms the State of Palestine’s desire to live, “side by side in peace and security with Israel”.
  • Acknowledges that the occupation began in 1967, rather than at the time of Israel’s creation.
  • Emphasizes that the Observer State application is in no way a substitute for final-status negotiations with Israel, whose “urgent resumption and acceleration” is called for.
  • Indicates that mutually agreed adjustments will be made to the 1967 borders in negotiations between the State of Israel and the State of Palestine.

On November 29, 1947, the Jews of Mandatory Palestine, the yishuv, rightly celebrated in the streets when the UN General Assembly approved the partition plan and endorsed the principle of the self-determination of the Jewish people. Sixty-five years later, we believe it is time for the UN to fulfill its two-state vision and recognize a state of Palestine alongside Israel.
We are deeply disturbed by reports of a threatened US cutoff of funds to Mr. Abbas’ government should he follow through with the application, as they suggest an American unwillingness to stand by the Palestinian proponents of a two-state solution. We call on President Obama to swiftly renew his administration’s serious efforts for Israeli-Palestinian peace.
We are similarly dismayed by reports of threatened Israeli punitive measures – including a withholding of Palestinian tax revenue, massive settlement construction, annexation of parts of the West Bank, and even the toppling of the Palestinian Authority.
Israel cannot decide who will lead the Palestinian people. But it can and does pursue policies that add legitimacy and validation to one side or the other. For four years, Israel’s current government has taken steps that have strengthened Hamas at the expense of Palestinian moderates, negotiating with, and making concessions to, Gaza’s hard-line rulers over prisoner releases and ceasefire terms, while at the same time spurning meaningful peace talks with Mr. Abbas and undermining his standing among his people by building thousands of housing units in West Bank settlements.
We call on Mr. Netanyahu at this critical hour to reverse this tragically misguided policy. We call on Mr. Netanyahu to publicly acknowledge that President Abbas is a worthy partner; to engage constructively with Mr. Abbas in order to achieve a two-state peace based on the 1967 borders, with agreed, equitable territorial exchanges; and to lead the chorus of nations that says ‘Yes’ to a State of Palestine at the United Nations, and alongside the State of Israel.

0 thoughts on “Zionists Endorse Palestinian Move at UN

  1. My full support! Thanks. ,
    Next steps: 1st Release of all political prisoners by Israel,mainly the elected parliamentarians of Fatah and Hamas ( Many good Israeli politicians were before 1947 violent fighters)
    2nd Israel showing serious interest in an friendly Palestinian neighbor it offers a peace treaty under the condition
    to be accepted together with the Palestinian Statehood. This offer must be qualified to convince the Palestinian
    people in a referendum. If Israel doesn’t offer such a proposal during the next 6 month, the US or alternately the
    UN should publish such a proposal and oversee the negotiations.
    A treaty with an underdog (remember 1919 with Germany as underdog didn’t last) would not be a solution for
    security in the Middle East.

    • Our friends in the Meretz party have just announced a “Four Point Plan” for peace: http://meretz.org.il/english/four-point-plan-initiating-peace-process/. The wording is somewhat awkward in English, but it involves a replacement of the Oslo framework by state-to-state relations between Israel and Palestine, a one-year timeframe for negotiating a final-status agreement, a four year limit on fully implementing that agreement, and mechanisms to immediately engage with the Saudi/Arab League peace initiative by involving regional powers (including the Arab League) in negotiations for a regional peace.
      This “five year plan” will include Israel freezing construction in the settlements, releasing prisoners and dismantling checkpoints (with these measures basically front-loaded in the first year).

  2. One could bottle and sell the naivity that ‘oozes’ from the proposed next step outlined in this article! All offers to PA previously made have been rejected, including the unbelievably generous Olmet plan which gave them virtually everything they wanted. When Bibi suspended J’slem construction for 10 months in order to advance the ‘peace talks’, Abbas only showed up at the very end of the term. PA still refuses to formally accept Israel as a Jewish state. The UN bid for ‘statehood’ abrogated Oslo, now freeing Israel’s hand. Israel has given and given away far more than it received in return, and there is absolutely no reason to believe that any further concessions will reap any rewards. Now is the time to put the ENTIRE onus on the PA and Hamas to demonstrate a will to a true peace, beginning with Hamas removing the imperative to destroy Israel in the name of Islam. Until that happens Israel should proceed to build in and eventually annex Judea and Samaria. Enough is enough!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *