California Scholars' Response to UC Campus Climate Reports

More

UC Santa Cruz students protesting Israeli government

UC Santa Cruz Jewish and non-Jewish student protesters. Credit: Matt Borden.


Two months ago, UC President Marc Yudof’s Advisory Council on Campus Climate, Culture and Inclusion released a report on the experiences of Jewish students on UC campuses. Co-authored by Rick Barton, a council member of the Anti-Defamation League, and Alice Huffman of the California NAACP, the report marks the culmination of what many have come to see as an attack on free speech and academic freedom under the disguise of protecting Jewish students from criticism of Israel.The following letter is a response to the report from an organization of UC professors and other academics who are focused on maintaining free and open academic debate.
Please sign this petition if you would like to urge President Yudof to disregard the report.

Dear President Yudof,
We, the California Scholars for Academic Freedom** write to urge you not to adopt the recommendations of the Jewish Student Campus Climate Report. We find the report’s recommendations pose a clear threat to academic freedom at the University of California. First, the report is based on sloppy methodology and clear bias. A comparison with the Muslim and Arab Student Campus Climate Report is instructive. The latter explains exactly how many people they spoke with, how they were put in touch with them, and lists their names and affiliations. The Jewish Student Campus Climate Report merely implies that they spoke with a range of people but never specifies with whom and how they were chosen. In fact, the two people who conducted the Jewish Student Campus Climate Report appear to have spoken almost exclusively with those who would like to silence criticism of Israel on UC campuses.
Second, the Muslim and Arab Student Campus Climate Report explains in great detail the exact nature of the discrimination that Muslim and Arab students experience on UC campuses, while the Jewish Student Campus Climate Report quotes unnamed people as feeling upset about criticisms of Israel. In fact, the report focuses almost exclusively on criticism of Israel as a supposedly objective measure of anti-Semitism while giving short shrift to the broad range of Jewish student experiences on UC campuses. The Jewish Student Campus Climate Report, despite a brief one-sentence disclaimer, essentially equates criticism of Israel with anti-Semitism, despite having to acknowledge that much of this criticism comes from Jewish faculty and students.
Indeed, one key piece of harassment is missing in this report: the harassment conducted by those who do not want to hear any criticism of Israel voiced at all on UC campuses. The harassment by these individuals has been intense, both against Muslim and Arab American students and faculty and against other Jewish students and faculty who criticize Israel. This harassment has occurred on all the UC campuses. Case in point: the UC Santa Cruz campus. Two individuals at UCSC mobilized thousands of emails to criticize faculty who exercised their academic freedom of speech to criticize Israel. These harassers are the ones who equate Jewish students and faculty who criticize Israel with Nazis.
They also claim bias in these events and lack of “balance,” despite the fact that they have organized numerous events that are propaganda for the state of Israel. More recently, individuals who try to suppress academic freedom of speech in relation to Israel have tried numerous campus avenues and legal means to try to suppress this speech.
Finally, the Muslim and Arab Student Climate Report has a range of sensible recommendations, including a streamlined reporting system for reports of discrimination, multicultural centers for dialogue across cultural and religious differences, more accommodations for religious observance, and enhanced educational opportunities about the Middle East and Islam. In contrast, the Jewish Student Campus Climate Report basically recommends censorship: developing a policy against “hate speech” and banning campus sponsorship of offensive activities. Given that this recommendation comes in the context of a report that focuses almost exclusively on debates about Palestine/Israel, this recommendation is certainly too one-sided.
Indeed, we are concerned that the Jewish Student Campus Climate Report, given its almost exclusive focus on Israel, will yet again make Muslim and Arab students feel unheard and unwelcome at the University of California.
The fact that you appointed Richard D. Barton, National Education Chair of the Anti-Defamation League, to carry out the “research” for the Jewish Student Campus Climate Report ensured a one-sided, biased report not based at all on objective research. The Anti-Defamation League is famous for its activism in the United States to suppress criticism of Israel. Barton’s leadership on this report meant from its inception that its sole goal would be to try to suppress criticism of Israel on the UC campuses. Otherwise, you would have appointed a neutral person with a history of conducting objective research.
The conflation of criticism of Israel with anti-semitism has become a common tactic by those who want to silence any criticism of Israel. We would never dream of equating criticism of the authoritarian government in China or the Free Tibet movement with anti-Chinese racism, despite the fact that many of our Chinese students identify strongly with mainland China and Chinese culture. We would never dream of equating criticism of authoritarian governments in Africa with racism against African Americans. More recently, we have not worried that criticisms of Egypt’s government or of Syria is a form of anti-Arab racism. The only way to counter speech we do not agree with is to encourage more speech.
Public universities have a special responsibility to protect academic freedom and freedom of speech. Academic freedom includes the freedom of professors to conduct and disseminate scholarly research, to design courses and teach students in the areas of their expertise, and to enjoy First Amendment protections for extramural speech. (The latter is a right enjoyed by everyone within the jurisdiction of the U.S. constitution, but is the third leg of the principles of academic freedom because professors should not be professionally penalized for non-academic speech that they engage in beyond the academy.)
The Jewish Student Campus Climate report points toward a dangerous trend of attempts to criminalize any speech discussing boycott, divestment or sanctions against Israel or settlements in the occupied territories, echoing a new law in Israel that punishes any public discussion of these activities. We do not want this abrogation of freedom of speech to be applied in California or by extension in the United States.
The courts have signaled that universities have a special responsibility to harbor even extreme speech. We urge you to affirm that the University of California strives to be a leader with regard to academic freedom and freedom of speech.
Yours,
California Scholars for Academic Freedom
Contact Persons:
Professor Lisa Rofel
Department of Anthropology
UC, Santa Cruz
LROFEL@ucsc.edu
831-459-3615
Professor Nancy Gallagher
Department of History
UC, Santa Barbara
Gallagher@history.ucsb.edu
805- 893-3467
Professor David Klein
Professor of Mathematics
California State University, Northridge
dklein8@gmail.com
cc: Board of Regents
Chancellors, Vice Chancellors, presidents of Academic Senates and chairs of Committee on Academic Freedom on all UC campuses
President, UC Systemwide Academic Senate
Chair, UC Systemwide Committee on Academic Freedom
**CALIFORNIA SCHOLARS FOR ACADEMIC FREEDOM is a four-year-old group of more than 134 academics who teach in over 20 California institutions of higher education. The group formed as a response to a rash of violations of academic freedom that were arising from both the post-9/11/2001 climate of civil rights violations and to the increasing attacks on progressive educators by neo-conservatives. Many attacks were aimed at scholars of Arab, Muslim or Middle Eastern descent or at scholars researching and teaching about the Middle East, Arab and Muslim communities. Our goal of protecting California Scholars and students based mainly in institutions of higher education has grown broader in scope. We recognize that violations of academic freedom anywhere are threats to academic freedom everywhere.

To learn more on this issue, click on the links below:
SFGate
+972
Salon
AlJazeera
Mondoweiss
Jewish Daily Forward

0 thoughts on “California Scholars' Response to UC Campus Climate Reports

  1. So… let’s say I started a “Palestinian Culture of Terror and Rejectionism Awareness Week”.
    Not sure that’d be acceptable – and for good reason.
    This is ridiculous

  2. In an academic environment free speech should not be extended to those who are on the payroll of extremist groups for either side of the argument. That undermines the purpose of academia and the principles of free speech.

  3. Is this the new Arab Spring on campus? Th Arab students attend school n the US have probably never seen so much academic freedom in their lives. Welcome to the US, where civil rights are protected.protesters by the thousands have died in the Arab world at the hands of their own leaders, trying to win the same freedom.
    Instad of focusing your wrath on your favorite punching bag, Israel,go march for the righties of Syrians who are literally being massacred or march agains the Taliban whose fighter recently beheaded several people for just attending a mixed gender party.
    @Cats i agree with you.

  4. Is this Islamaphobia or anti Palestinian Arab oppression on a college campus?
    http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4274319,00.html
    US: Jewish student says attackers yelled ‘Heil Hitler’
    Zach Tennen says to men at off-campus party asked him if he was Jewish before knocking him unconscious, stapling his mouth. Father: I want them to pay for what they did
    Ynet
    Published: 08.29.12, 00:38 / Israel News
    A Jewish student at Michigan State University said he was assaulted at an off-campus party on Sunday because of his religion.
    Zach Tennen, 19, who suffered a broken jaw, told police his attackers asked him if he was Jewish before beating him and stapling his mouth shut through his gums. He told WDIV-TV in Detroit that his attackers also “were making Nazi and Hitler symbols and they said they were part of the KKK.”
    Related articles:
    Austria investigates alleged anti-Jewish cartoon
    Indian Jews enraged over shop called Hitler
    Op-ed: Getting away with anti-Semitism
    Tennen, a journalism sophomore, was recovering at home in Oakland County Tuesday after undergoing surgery overnight for a broken jaw.
    He said two men at the party approached him and asked if he was Jewish. When he said he was, they raised their arms in a Nazi salute, chanted “Heil Hitler” and then knocked Tennen unconscious.
    Tennen at hospital
    Tina Tennen, the victim’s mother, said that while her son was out the men stapled his mouth, putting a staple into his gums while about 20 people watched.
    Zach told police the two men then “stapled me in the back side of my bottom teeth, starting in my gums and going upwards,” his father Bruce Tennen read Tuesday from his son’s statement to East Lansing Police.
    Zachary told his parents no one at the party helped him as he was attacked then thrown out of the gathering. He took a cab to Sparrow Hospital in Lansing for initial treatment, but underwent surgery in metro Detroit overnight to have his jaw wired shut, his mother said.
    “I’m really, really upset in a few ways,” Zach told MSU’s website before his surgery. “First of all it is a terrible experience, physically and also mentally to know someone would do something like this.
    “It almost seemed like they tried to kill me, and to think about that in my brain, physically – it isn’t very pleasant,” he said.
    Bruce Tennen said he’s working with the Anti-Defamation League to make sure the two men are found and prosecuted. He said he’ll support an investigation by the FBI if local police do not make an arrest.
    “I will do everything in my power to see that the assailants are located, A, and B, arraigned, jailed and prosecuted,” Tennen said.
    “I want them to pay for what they did. I want them to understand the ramifications of what they did as opposed to walking away and laugh and say you blanking Jew. And if it has to take a court of law to do it, they have to be prosecuted. He was an innocent victim.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *