Americanism Defined

More

The people of the United States face threats to their safety, health, and economic well being that are not being addressed by Congress. Congress has a favorability rating in the single digits, yet we continue to re-elect the vast majority of its members every two years. The reason is that most Americans seem afraid to face the greatest threat: that the Democratic experiment may fail because of rabid partisanship, for which we are ultimately responsible. The dangers our government is failing to address pose a threat to the rest of the world given the economic and military dominance of the United States over other nations.

If we want a government of, by, and for the People, we must achieve consensus on where we want our leaders to take us. That requires forging a consensus on what kind of America we want to leave our children. This is the crux of the dilemma in which we find ourselves. If we cannot agree on what we want our elected officials to do, then they will continue to do as they please. That is generally to keep themselves in office by catering to the interests of the special interests that pay for their obscenely expensive election campaigns.

Our task as Americans is thus to end the ability of the moneyed few to control the electoral process. As long as we continue to labor under the delusion that one party or the other represents our interests, we will continue to fight each other instead of the plutocracy that controls our government by virtue of their wealth and power. When both parties concede that they must continue competing for special interest money, supporting either unconditionally makes us complicit in a system that is driving America away from the path to true democracy.

Democracy cannot exist where a people are not good enough to rule themselves. That means a society that does not assure that the rights and needs of all of its citizens is not a true democracy, which is predicated on the notion that every citizen has equal opportunity to thrive in that system. It does not mean that wealth is redistributed by the government. It means that one of the roles of government is to ensure that an economic aristocracy does not arise to take control of it. We as a nation have failed to do that.

We are a society where teachers are demonized for contributing to the economic decline because they dare to demand decent pay and health care in exchange for preparing our children to be productive and responsible citizens.

The assault on teachers is just one piece of the general effort to wage class warfare on the worker. In attempting to systematically destroy unions by taking away the right to collective bargaining that Reagan once said was fundamental to democracy, the wealthy are attacking the entire middle class. If we do not realize that and work together to protect ourselves, we will fail in our duty to leave our children a world better than we found it.

Jefferson taught that democracy cannot survive without educated citizens. He knew that a People who forget their history are condemned to repeat the mistakes of the past. The battle between Americans like Jefferson who wanted a nation of free people and those who refused to abandon the notion that a few privileged individuals had a divine right to rule over the many has been going on since the founding of the nation. We are at a time in history when we must finally finish the Revolution born in the blood shed by those who gave their lives for the freedom of all people, including generations of men and women around the world yet unborn.

If we are to ensure that the last, best hope for Mankind does not perish from the Earth then we must put aside the artificial distinctions that divide us and work together to end control of the government by special interests. That means that we must decide what it is that we can all agree is the minimum expectation of those seeking our votes in 2012 and beyond. In my view, that is their pledge to support a constitutional amendment to end the ability of wealthy and powerful special interests to control the electoral process.

This is a collective, nonpartisan cause that will require us to reject the fallacy that the unique characteristic that makes one an American is not individual freedom to do as one pleases with no regard to the effect of our actions on others. The true character of those who founded our nation was defined by their willingness to put their lives and sacred honor on the line for the sake of ensuring liberty and justice for all people around the Earth forever.

0 thoughts on “Americanism Defined

  1. Western civilisation comes from two myths fiercely opposing and fighting each other in a schizophrenical (that is inside each one of us) way: The classic mith and the Jewish-Christian.
    What we call “Right” and “Left”, to my opinion, is strongly bound to these Miths. And our mith (way of thinking) is something that we can’t discuss with rationality, abandon, or change so easily.
    The classic mith “sees” a world were The Hero (the one who demonstrate to be the “best”)is destined to RULE over ALL the others. The Jewish-Christian miths sees a World Where evrybody has equal right of others because everybody is a Son of God.
    Since 2.000 years, we are trying to get a compromise between the two. Mainly trough what we call “Churches”( until French Revolution), or (after), trough democracy …
    The problems you expose hereover points to this question, being America the ultimate inheritance of western civilisation.
    Howewer I wish all the western people, to get by…

  2. I believe that Gianmaria Gabusi’s comment is more helpful than the article above it. Of course, Lincoln said (First Inaugural)
    “This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing Government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it or their revolutionary right to dismember or
    overthrow it.”
    The former alternative is not feasible, (no matter how weary we grow of the existing government) because of the existing Corporate Imperial State. If we attempt the latter, we are likely to be imprisoned (without trial), renditioned, or assassinated by a Drone.
    Anybody know of another alternative?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *