<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tikkun Daily Blog &#187; Charles Gelman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tikkun.org/tikkundaily/author/immanentframe2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tikkun.org/tikkundaily</link>
	<description>A Voice for Tikkun Olam (healing the world)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:20:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Charles Gelman: Christianity and the crash</title>
		<link>http://www.tikkun.org/tikkundaily/2009/12/23/christianity-and-the-crash/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tikkun.org/tikkundaily/2009/12/23/christianity-and-the-crash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 21:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles Gelman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Economy--Wealth & Poverty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hanna Rosin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prosperity gospel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tikkun.org/tikkundaily/?p=8432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At The Immanent Frame thirteen esteemed scholars and journalists offer their responses to Hanna Rosin&#8217;s December 2009 Atlantic article, &#8220;Did Christianity Cause the Crash?&#8221; Below is an excerpt from Sarah Posner&#8217;s comments: The prosperity gospel is a lot older than derivatives, credit default swaps, and other byzantine Wall Street &#8220;products&#8221; that leveled the financial markets. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tikkun.org/tikkundaily/2009/12/23/christianity-and-the-crash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charles Gelman: Beginning with witness</title>
		<link>http://www.tikkun.org/tikkundaily/2009/12/08/beginning-with-witness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tikkun.org/tikkundaily/2009/12/08/beginning-with-witness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 15:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles Gelman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Inter-Culturalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics & Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War & Peace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fellowship of Reconciliation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interfaith organizing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pacifism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tikkun.org/tikkundaily/?p=7888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At The Immanent Frame, Nathan Schneider interviews Mark Johnson, Executive Director of the Fellowship of Reconciliation: NS: How is the FOR’s religious identity evolving today? MJ: We’re forced to ask ourselves what it means to do peacemaking in an interreligious—or even a secular—world. There’s quite a bit of anxiety among many people, who are asking, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tikkun.org/tikkundaily/2009/12/08/beginning-with-witness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charles Gelman: So you want to be a new atheist</title>
		<link>http://www.tikkun.org/tikkundaily/2009/11/20/so-you-want-to-be-a-new-atheist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tikkun.org/tikkundaily/2009/11/20/so-you-want-to-be-a-new-atheist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles Gelman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rethinking Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New Atheists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tikkun.org/tikkundaily/?p=7273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week at The Immanent Frame, Professor Kathryn Lofton comments on the millennial masculinism of the new atheists: If you want to be a New Atheist, you are worried a lot. You are worried about the Bible and the Koran, about Talibans and new Inquisitions, about Jerry Falwell and, even more insidiously, Mother Teresa. You&#8217;re [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tikkun.org/tikkundaily/2009/11/20/so-you-want-to-be-a-new-atheist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charles Gelman: Religion, law, and the politics of human rights</title>
		<link>http://www.tikkun.org/tikkundaily/2009/11/09/religion-law-and-the-politics-of-human-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tikkun.org/tikkundaily/2009/11/09/religion-law-and-the-politics-of-human-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles Gelman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inter-Culturalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics & Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rethinking Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War & Peace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abdullahi An-Na'im]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Talal Asad]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tikkun.org/tikkundaily/?p=6727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New at The Immanent Frame: Talal Asad and Abdullahi An-Na&#8217;im both stand at the forefront of the challenging and constructive exchange taking place today between European and Islamic traditions of political, legal, and religious thought. At a recent event organized by Georgetown University&#8217;s Berkley Center for Religion, Peace, and World Affairs, the two scholars traded [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tikkun.org/tikkundaily/2009/11/09/religion-law-and-the-politics-of-human-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charles Gelman: The philosopher-citizen</title>
		<link>http://www.tikkun.org/tikkundaily/2009/10/19/the-philosopher-citizen/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tikkun.org/tikkundaily/2009/10/19/the-philosopher-citizen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles Gelman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rethinking Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Taylor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[habermas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social theory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tikkun.org/tikkundaily/?p=5903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At The Immanent Frame, eminent philosopher Charles Taylor reflects on the life and work of his colleague Jürgen Habermas: Jürgen Habermas is known in the world of analytic philosophy primarily as a moral and political philosopher. He has striven against a slide which has often seemed plausible and tempting for modern thinkers, that towards a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tikkun.org/tikkundaily/2009/10/19/the-philosopher-citizen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charles Gelman: Obama and the Dalai Lama</title>
		<link>http://www.tikkun.org/tikkundaily/2009/10/16/obama-and-the-dalai-lama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tikkun.org/tikkundaily/2009/10/16/obama-and-the-dalai-lama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles Gelman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buddhism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics & Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War & Peace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dalai Lama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spirituality in politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tibet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tikkun.org/tikkundaily/?p=5851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today at The Immanent Frame, Professors Robbie Barnett, Cameron David Warner, Carole Ann McGranahan, and Edward Friedman respond to our questions about President Obama&#8217;s recent decision to postpone meeting with the Dalai Lama until after his upcoming summit with Chinese head of state Hu Jintao: What does Obama&#8217;s decision say about his strategy regarding the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tikkun.org/tikkundaily/2009/10/16/obama-and-the-dalai-lama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charles Gelman: &#8220;Unchurched believers&#8221;: on the growth of the &#8220;no religion&#8221; population</title>
		<link>http://www.tikkun.org/tikkundaily/2009/10/01/unchurched-believers-on-the-growth-of-the-no-religion-population/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tikkun.org/tikkundaily/2009/10/01/unchurched-believers-on-the-growth-of-the-no-religion-population/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 16:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles Gelman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics & Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spirituality in politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Immanent Frame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unchurched]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tikkun.org/tikkundaily/?p=5117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over at The Immanent Frame, sociologists Michael Hout and Claude S. Fischer discuss the results of their research on the growing number of Americans professing &#8220;no religion.&#8221; Hout and Fischer&#8217;s study suggests that while institutional affiliation and confessional identification are on the decline, traditional religious belief systems are not. They attribute this dynamic largely to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tikkun.org/tikkundaily/2009/10/01/unchurched-believers-on-the-growth-of-the-no-religion-population/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charles Gelman: Religious pluralism and civic belonging in the United States</title>
		<link>http://www.tikkun.org/tikkundaily/2009/09/25/religious-pluralism-and-civic-belonging-in-the-united-states/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tikkun.org/tikkundaily/2009/09/25/religious-pluralism-and-civic-belonging-in-the-united-states/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles Gelman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics & Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rethinking Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizenship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pluralism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protestantism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Immanent Frame]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tikkun.org/tikkundaily/?p=4852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At The Immanent Frame, Richard Amesbury explores the role of denominationalism in the formation of religious identities and configurations of "civic belonging" in the United States.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tikkun.org/tikkundaily/2009/09/25/religious-pluralism-and-civic-belonging-in-the-united-states/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charles Gelman: Religion for radicals: an interview with Terry Eagleton</title>
		<link>http://www.tikkun.org/tikkundaily/2009/09/18/religion-for-radicals-an-interview-with-terry-eagleton/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tikkun.org/tikkundaily/2009/09/18/religion-for-radicals-an-interview-with-terry-eagleton/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 21:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles Gelman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inter-Culturalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics & Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rethinking Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Economy--Wealth & Poverty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marxism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terry Eagleton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tikkun.org/tikkundaily/?p=4615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At The Immanent Frame, Nathan Schneider interviews Terry Eagleton, author of <em>Reason, Faith, and Revolution: Reflections on the God Debate</em>, on the inextricability of religion and politics, and the possibility of constructing an iteration of Christianity relevant to contemporary radicals and humanists.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tikkun.org/tikkundaily/2009/09/18/religion-for-radicals-an-interview-with-terry-eagleton/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.tikkun.org/tikkundaily/author/immanentframe2/feed/ ) in 1.59218 seconds, on Feb 9th, 2012 at 11:31 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 9th, 2012 at 12:11 pm UTC -->
