In which the strange actions of Joseph towards his brothers are read as a guide to societal transformation.
This week’s Torah reading begins, as does that of last week, with the recounting of dreams. This time, however, it is Pharoah who has a troubling dream, which is then interpreted by Yosef (Joseph) who is pulled out of prison in order to do the reading. Pharoah likes the interpretation, and by royal edict brings about a rags to riches denouement leading to the sort-of happy end to this story, with a reunion of Yosef and his brothers who sold him into slavery. However, this isn’t the kind of reunion anyone would want to have been invited to. Yosef will put all his brothers and his father through a great deal of grief before revealing himself to them. He will accuse them of being spies, lock one of them up for safe keeping, frame his youngest brother for stealing royal property by placing a goblet in his pack, and then make them drag their old long suffering father all the way from Canaan as terms for the brother’s bail.
It’s a rough story; I feel that the truth is with the classic Yiddish joke about an old woman, who cries the first time she reads this story of the sale of Yosef in her Tzena Urena (the accepted volume of paraphrased Bible stories in Yiddish, back in the days when that was all the learning permitted for women). The first time she read the story, she wept bitterly over Yosef’s being sold into slavery; the next year, when she read the episode, she got angry, because instead of going out to his brothers “again”, by now he shoulda known better.
In other words, our familiarity with the stories breeds an acceptance of things we would not tolerate in reality. Are we comfortable with this “revenge story”, the vengeance Yosef metes out to his brothers and father? (Interestingly, there has been a wave in Korean cinema of “revenge” films based around family tragedies that wouldn’t be far from a literal reading of this passage, just with more slo-mo violence and blood).
The Beer Mayim Hayim is not comfortable with this reading; in line with his normal rejection of suffering as acceptable, particularly in the sacred literature. In his extended reading of this episode, he presents a version of Yosef’s actions as revealing truths about how to respond to a world of dissolving identity, and how a community can maintain its individuality in a world of nihilism.