NPR, Tea parties, and getting real: Appreciating the Good and Finding the Truth
by: Roger S. Gottlieb on March 10th, 2011 | 9 Comments »
Dear reader – as you look this over keep in mind that politically I’m so far to the left I fall off the planet every once in a while. Socialist, feminist, rabid environmentalist – all that sort of thing. But in thinking about the recent flap at NPR, I’m really hoping we can do better than the usual knee-jerks on all sides.
In case you missed it, some right-wing activists posing as potential donors got NPR’s leading fundraiser into a conversation about the Tea Party movement. With a hidden camera rolling along, the fundraiser said all sort of nasty things about them: gun carrying racists, xenophobes, and so forth. With NPR’s federal support under attack from Republicans, the footage has proved to be just the fodder they want to push first the House, and now the Senate, to end funding.
Let’s take the obvious responses first. The fundraiser is not the institution, and an awful lot of other people supported by the government have disdain for sectors of the electorate who pay the taxes that line their pockets. We can imagine, for example, what some of the churches supported by Bush’s “faith based initiatives” thought of Planned Parenthood and radical lesbians, or what a lot of Midwestern farmers think of Greenpeace and PETA.
Also, it is not hard to see the Right’s concerted attack on NPR as one more blow against anyone who will stand against the power of capital. Unions are being busted; the government has been the object of ideological attack for decades. Major media outlets that are at least a little critical of corporate recklessness, dishonest, and pollution are hard to find, an important resource, and something corporate America would duly love to kill off.
That said however, let’s look at the immediate subject: liberals and the Tea Party folks. Keep in mind what I said above about my politics – I think they are wrong about most, if not all things. And that includes their take on religion as well as on politics.
But here’s another perspective for me and for all the liberal and radicals who get so upset by Sarah Palin and her legions of immigrant-hating, abortion-outlawing, environmentalism-bashing, government-support-denying, aggressive foreign policy types.
First I want to say that the Tea Party movement is good for America: not because they are right, but because they care. Here are people without much direct interest in the policies they support, taking the time and energy to enter into the democratic process. And to enter it not just by individual voting – which is, after all, barely one step above total passivity; but by meeting together, holding caucuses, writing proclamations, arguing about policies, and working for candidates. They have taken their concern and their commitment to the public square, out of the bars, TV dominated living rooms, texting, and internet addiction. For that they deserve our respect.
And the second thing I want to say is that just because I see in the Tea Party more than just racist morons, but civically concerned citizens, my response, and the one that I’d like to see liberal and progressive leaders make, is: Let’s talk. Not debate and score points and sound bites. But let’s really talk about where we are coming from and what has shaped us as moral, political, and spiritual beings. What we hope for and what scares the hell out of us. Years ago someone in Boston brought together three leaders of the pro-choice movement with three pro-life activists, to talk in just the way I’m suggesting here. They didn’t ‘convince’ each other. But they became friends, developed some understanding, and were able to make some human contact across the divide.
I’d like to do the same thing in this context.
Finally, although I doubt too many Tea Party folks are reading this, I have a suggestion for them as well. If the NPR guy, who was no fool, after all, thinks the Tea Party, is a bunch of racists, maybe you guys have to ask yourselves to what extent racism is an element of your movement. Maybe what he said was a wild, partisan exaggeration. But it still could have some truth in it. And thus perhaps it’s your responsibility to look as hard as you can to find that truth and act on it, not lapse into programmed “outrage” and “offense” that not even you believe.
Appreciating the good, even if it comes with stuff we don’t like. Trying to find the truth even if it’s buried in falsehood. Learning to communicate across the divide.
Wouldn’t that make a nice change in American political life?



So Roger, what’s the plan? Which Tea Party group do you want to start the real talk with? Edwin Rutsch, a videographer here in the Bay Area, almost got this kind of talking to happen recently and still has it in mind I believe: he invited me along and I would love to do it but haven’t had the energy to make it happen myself. Here’s his video at a Tea Party rally: http://cultureofempathy.com/Projects/TeaParty/index.htm
Roger, thank you for expressing the view that the Tea Party is good for America. I feel the same, although there are times when I get amused or angry with their leadership. I do worry about manipulation, but I suppose right and left better be worried about that.
Tom,
Manipulation is real factor, no doubt about it. But you can’t manipulate emptiness. The trick is to focus as well on the real concerns that are getting manipuated, and see if you can make common ground out of them.
rsg
Roger,
For the U.S., my real concern is the continued reduction of a middle class. To me, this is so real and so easy to verify (mathematically, socially, politically, etc.). A strong middle class is a major factor in every sustainable democracy………….again, this can be verified, historically. Yet this foundation stone can and is being spun by corporate powers.
I hope to see the day when the many middle class Tea Party members can sit down with us lefties and discuss what to do about this development.
Yes indeed. The question is the fragmention of the political subject. The biggest failure of the New Left generation was that we just fragmented it in different ways. Maybe we couldn’t have succeeded in any case, because we were up against white and male privilege. But we didn’t seem to try very hard to overcome it. We just indulged ourselves. And in many ways we still are.
I don’t agree that just getting people involved and active is necessarily good for the country. It depends on which values and policies they support. Pulling us further to the Right is not good.
Very well put. And the further point is that if we can’t do that with, e.g., the Tea Party, we won’t be able to do it with people who are like us either. Think of all the painful splits in the history of the Left: small groups splitting into even smaller ones to find some kind of ideological perfection. What a waste!
And I can’t help but suggest I have some further insights into this in my new book ENGAGING VOICES. The Introduction is/was on the new Tikkun website. Or you can bet more info here:
Engaging Voices: Tales of Morality and Meaning in an Age of Global Warming.
http://www.amazon.com/Engaging-Voices-Morality-Meaning-Warming/dp/product-description/1602582602
I’m definitely all for going to the left. But I’d rather people were involved than not inovlved. Because only an involved citizenry can make a real democracy. Otherwise it’s jus the same old ruling class.
it’s all good, & i thank Roger for his willingness to address this issue so positively: if we cannot talk, respect each others views in spite of differences, what does this say about us as a people? acceptance is not contingent upon agreement, & through a willingness to see an issue through another’s eyes, new perceptions can arise. this is not compromise, but strategic common sense!