I have been editing and posting transcripts of speeches from the June Network of Spiritual Progressives conference to our website and I am blown away by how good some of them are. Like this:

In theory, if you want the outcomes – equality, environmental change, community stability – you can rig the incentives and the regulatory structure to get the corporations to do that for you. The problem in actual practice is they’re too powerful. We know that. “Well,” he said, “well if you can’t get that, then how are you going to get what you’re talking about?” That’s a really good question, so I want to address it and then we can debate it.

If I didn’t think there was a possibility that was different from “The pendulum will swing and we’ll elect a few more Democrats” – I come out of liberalism, I worked in the House and the Senate, I know that world – if I didn’t think there was another possibility, then I wouldn’t be here.

What I think is really interesting, and why I think this is the most interesting period in American history bar none – including the Revolution, including the Civil War, including the Depression, including the Civil Rights and Feminist eras – is that what’s happened is that the solution that we used to have available to manage the system through traditional means is faltering, and there is no easy answer that way. And unlike [what] the Marxists [believe] – this is where it gets really interesting – it is not collapsing. It is not reforming and it is not collapsing.

That means we may have a long time period [for] the kind of things that David [Korten] and I are talking about, the evolutionary reconstruction. You know why things are happening in Cleveland that are new? Because there is a hell of a lot of pain and it is not being solved, but it is not collapsing. That may be the only way to achieve a democratic revolution. The slow reconstruction from the bottom up, out of failure but not collapse, because if it collapses, it is going to be taken over by the Right, not the Left.

I want to just sharpen this. I’m suggesting to you that this is a very unusual period of history. I call it “stalemate and decay.” You can see that negatively, you can see all the pain. But that means the possibility of reconstruction may be implicit, and that means us getting busy. That’s why I think there is a possibility of laying groundwork. When the next banking crisis comes, there’s another possibility it’s going to occur. When the pain levels increase and the cost-levels out of this crazy health care system occur, there’s another possibility.

There are going to be possibilities that are really interesting that are not collapse possibilities. So institutional reconstruction may be possible only out of this environment of stalemate and decay. That’s debatable, obviously. That’s why I say I am cautiously optimistic. Here’s the nasty part. You want to play this game? The chips are decades of your life. Don’t play unless you want to play the long-term game. That’s what this is about: laying groundwork and building.

Wow. That’s from a workshop on Economic Transformation of American Society: New Directions. The speaker is Gar Alperovitz, historian, activist and Professor of Political Economy at the University of Maryland, author of America Beyond Capitalism, Reclaiming Our Wealth, Our Liberty and Our Democracy, and, with Lew Daly, Unjust Deserts , which he and Daly summarized in Tikkun here. See garalperovitz.com.


Bookmark and Share