Permaculture and Paganism, an Interview with Starhawk (1)
by: Nancy Vedder-Shults on April 6th, 2010 | 7 Comments »
Starhawk was generous with her time while she was here in Madison a month ago. She granted me two interviews, the first about Palestine and the second — which I will begin to post today now that I’m back from my vacation — about permaculture. For those of you who don’t know her, Starhawk is the best-known Wiccan author alive today. She’s published eleven books, including The Spiral Dance, which introduced many of us to Wicca. From the beginning of her career, she’s been very involved as an activist, and since the 1990s she’s been most active in promoting permaculture.
Star came to permaculture as a natural outgrowth of her Paganism. After many years in the Goddess movement — where we declared that the Earth was a sacred, living organism that manifests Herself in the cycles of birth, growth, death, and regeneration that occur in all of nature, including our own human culture — Star discovered permaculture. She soon realized it was a practical application of her spiritual path.
Permaculture began as a way to imitate the relationships found in nature in order to design human communities and agricultural systems. As Star tells us in this interview, two Australians — Bill Mollison and David Holmgren — discovered many of the principles of permaculture while studying the Tasmanian rainforest. Their interest began when they started to ask questions like “Why is the rainforest thriving when no one is pruning it, spraying it for bugs, or fertilizing the soil? How does it care for itself? And why couldn’t we grow food for humans in the same way that the rainforest provides for itself?”
According to Star, Bill and David developed a set of ethics and principles based on what they discovered about natural systems. The ethics are quite straightforward: 1) Care for the Earth, 2) Care for people, and 3) Care for the future a) by sharing the surplus, b) by returning what you have to the land, and c) by limiting your consumption. These ethics guide the way permaculture implements its principles and creates and designs its systems.
According to Starhawk, permaculture’s many principles derive from one overarching understanding, namely that we should look at systems and relationships rather than at separate, isolated objects. This is also the core of Pagan philosophy and indigenous spirituality. For example, the Lakota say “Ho mitakuye oyasin,” meaning “all our relations,” a saying that indicates many times a day that we are a part of an interconnected whole. Within the Goddess movement, we also view life as a set of relationships. It’s our relationship with the natural world that sustains our lives, and it’s the relationships within nature that sustain the biodiversity, abundance, and beauty in our world.
Permaculture’s principles can be easily deduced, according to Starhawk, if you ask a few basic questions: For example, where are things in relationship to each other? If systems are designed to create the right relationships, Star told me, it saves a lot of energy, a lot of material, and a lot of human effort. So, for instance, if you catch water high enough up in your landscape, you won’t need to pump it. Or if you place your garden near your house, you will be able to tend it as you walk through it during the course of your day. And if you place those plants that need the most tending closest to your house, you’ll notice their needs and take care of them in a timely maner. One of the sayings of the permaculture movement is that if your woodpile is between the house and the outhouse, you’ll be able to bring in a few sticks at a time and never have to burden yourself with the heavy task of fetching wood.
Another good question from the perspective of permaculture is when things happen in relation to each other. Using the example of a garden again, you need to prepare the ground first, before you plant any seeds. Then the seeds can take root and thrive. This principle doesn’t just apply to gardens, Star told me, but is a sound economic standard as well. We need businesses to become rooted in our communities and become responsible to them. We desperately need these moral values at this time in history as a counter to climate change and to the oppressive aspects of globalization. Local institutions will not deplete our energy resources as quickly as those located far away. And instead of extracting wealth for shareholders who live someplace else, our businesses will be accountable and serve the needs of their own communities and provide a decent livelihood for the people work for them.
Another permaculture principle Starhawk talked about is catching and storing energy. The sun showers us everyday with energy, and if we can catch it, store it, and reuse it, that provides us with abundance. We can capture sunlight with solar panels, but we can also absorb it in the plants we grow and eat. This principle can also be translated into an economic concept. It’s easy to see that it’s not the number of dollars that come into a community that generates wealth, but how often they recirculate before they leave the area.
In nature, there’s no waste, Starhawk went on to say. When one thing dies, it feeds another. In fact, even one creature’s excretions can become another creature’s resource. Permaculture has developed a corollary to this natural principle, namely that pollution is an unused resource. Star’s example highlighted this concept. Sewage can be a tremendous pollutant, she said, but when dealt with properly, it can become a great source of nutrients. Millions of children die every year from water contaminated by sewage, but in reality, it’s not hard to deal with human waste. It’s only dangerous when it’s flushed away in water that then can’t be used for other purposes. Star tells her students that there’s nothing easier than building a composting toilet that can turn that lethal substance into a natural fertilizer that can then help grow crops or trees. What’s so interesting is that when we start to learn these things, we realize that there’s a cycle of destruction that we can turn around, creating a cycle of regeneration and rebuilding instead. “The problem is the solution,” Star said, quoting another permaculture saying.



Thanks Nancy. Looking forward to some more words from Starhawk. I’m a permaculturalist and have a couple of videos on Rosemary Morrow implementing permaculture from her own back yard to Afghanistan. You can check them out:
http://www.retrofittingyourhome.com
http://www.thegardenattheendoftheworld.info
cheers,
Gary
this is so good! it’s all about relationships–everything exists in relationship! nothing exists in isolation, yet we act as if all does. i support this work, & am grateful to receive these wise words from a very wise lady! will look forward to more!
Gary, thanks for the URLs. Rosemary Morrow looks like she’s doing good work, just like Starhawk.
Virginia, I agree that everything exists in relationship, and we need to shift our focus in this culture from so much individualism and competition to seeing that reality of life. I actually wrote a blog post about just that a few months back. It’s at http://www.tikkun.org/tikkundaily/2009/07/31/individualism-wont-get-us-there/.
Hello! Thought I’d mention a great how-to book on permaculture: “Edible Forest Gardening”. Who knew you should make sure your garden spiders need ample access to drinking water?
Thanks, Elissa.
Permaculture and paganism – YES. Permaculture is so much about learning from the land and flora that are there. Do not break the soil with mechanical means, but re-introduce benefitial diversity.
Check out Fukuoka, One Straw Revolution. Mollison calls him the spiritual grandfather of PC.
It seems the difficulty with neo-paganism is that it involves worshiping/revering nature. What, you are moved to ask, is wrong with that? My answer: What is wrong with nature-worship is that we should only worship (be absolutely deferential to) that which is absolutely good. But nature is clearly not absolutely good; that is to say, it is not perfect. How do I know nature isn’t perfect?
Answer: First of all, human beings are surely a part of nature, and human beings are not perfect. In fact, too many of us are wicked and cruel. I do not espouse here the Christian notion of Original Sin (though I respect Christianity greatly), rather I point only to the unnecessary suffering humans have often inflicted upon one another, to say nothing of the environmental damage we’ve done.
Secondly, nature often breeds diseases and disasters, which cause even more suffering. Neo-paganism, I must respectfully submit, is surely not the answer for spiritually, ethically sensitive people trying to forge a personal identity. The best value system is ethical monotheism, which, rightly conceived, regards nature as the deliberate creation of a transcendent and just God. Only this God of absolute goodness and perfection should elicit our absolute loyalty and deference. Only this One beyond all things is worthy of being called Divine, it seems to me. Of course this doesn’t mean there is not a lot of good in humanity and nature; it just means that neither (currently) is perfect or divine.
I’d be interested in reading the thoughts and observations of neo-pagans who have read this argument, as many neo-pagans are fine, upstanding, intelligent people for whom I have nothing but respect.
But I think it’s a legitimate and healthy discussion to have.