Chuck Grassley, “Medicaid Fraud” and the IRS
by: Lauren Reichelt on April 1st, 2010 | 12 Comments »
Cross-posted as a Morning Feature at Daily Kos.
Rachel Maddow, Keith Olbermann and other luminaries are skewering Senator Charles Grassley (R-IA) for crowing about his insertion of a new IRS rule into the Health Care Reform Bill after first voting against HCR. Because he has publicly mocked and blocked HCR (along with other Repubs), and because the importance of his new rule is only appreciated by hospital financing aficianados, his announcement had the loft of a lead comforter.
I love Rachel Maddow. I wake up every weekday at 5:00 am to her podcasts. And I am no fan of Chuck Grassley. But I am ecstatic about the Grassley rule. You will be too, once you understand it. If McConnell’s minions were Little Red Riding Hood, the Grassley insertion would be the Big, Bad Wolf dressed like Granny without a death panel in site. (Where are those blasted panels when you need em?)
Grassley has quietly provided communities across the US with a powerful tool to build support for ongoing reform.
“Medicaid (and Medicare) Fraud”
At Obama’s Bi-partisan Health Summit on February 25, Tom Coburn (R-OK) suggested that eliminating fraud in government-run health programs (Medicare and Medicaid) would obviate the need for more comprehensive reform:
And when you look at, when it’s studied, if you look at what Malcolm Sparrow from Harvard says, he says 20 percent of the cost of federal government health care is fraud. That’s his number [snip]…Well, when you look at the total amount of health care that’s government run, you know, you’re talking $150 billion a year.
“Government-run health care fraud” is a catch-all phrase used by politicos of various persuasions to refer to a variety of otherwise unrelated financing issues.
Because Americans are typically segregated by income, individuals without means to pay for health care are heavily concentrated in certain communities while those with insurance reside elsewhere. People of color are more likely to be uninsured and to reside in these zipcodes as well. Lacking insured clientele, health care providers in low-income communities use Medicaid to subsidize astronomical rates of unreimbursed care and to stay afloat. In other words, Medicaid payments are used to cover the costs of undocumented workers, low-income adults between the ages of 19 and 54 (who qualify for neither Medicaid, which covers children, nor Medicare, which covers the elderly), and individuals such as those with mental illness who find it difficult to apply for help.
Prior to the Bush administration, the Feds averted their gaze from this practice because most competent career health officials realize removal of Medicaid subsidies would cause the collapse of our public health infrastructure. Bushies replaced career civil servants with political appointees, labeled the subsidies “Medicaid Fraud,” and attempted vigorously to eliminate them. Subsidies to for-profit insurance and hospitals were left untouched.
In contrast, when reformers use the phrases “Medicaid” or “Medicare Fraud,” they are often referring to some of the dubious and extremely opaque financing illusions used by both non-profit and for-profit hospital chains to make our public indigent dollars turn into rabbits. In most communities, the hospital is the 800 lb. gorilla in the health care arena. Hospitals suck up a lot of money, and, in many communities, refuse to collaborate with community-based health care providers, while displatying little concern for the indigent care safety net. Hospitals use a wide variety of tricks to move money into private hands including outrageously priced goods and services (such as the $50 aspirin), hospital buying groups, and aggregated IRS reporting for chains which makes it impossible to examine the finances of individual community hospitals within the chain.
Charles Grassley has been concerned with the opacity of hospital financing and its impact on America’s health care delivery system for over a decade. In the Clinton years, he and Orrin Hatch presented an alternative proposal very similar to the “Obamacare” they are now maligning. Grassley has lead investigations into various conflicts of hospital interest such as the buying groups mentioned above.
A third group, the ultra-right-wing spin-meisters (such as the newsies at Fox) note that many people on Medicaid have dark skin, that undocumented residents show up in the same clinics as other uninsured dark people, and make up stories about Medicaid Welfare Queens driving Cadillacs.
Bush’s War on “Medicaid Fraud”
In the waning years of his Presidency, after he had emptied HHS of much of its qualified staff and intimidated the rest, Bush 43 moved aggressively to address Medicaid Fraud Part A (using Medicaid to subsidize the cost of high rates of uninsured) to bypass Congress and impose through arcane regulation what seventeen governors called, “simply awful public policy.” In short, he decided to eliminate a variety of permissible activities including:
- Medicaid funds for hospitals matched by state or local government to subsidize non-Medicaid indigent care;
- Medicaid funds used to subsidize graduate medical education and teaching hospitals;
- Medicaid funds used by schools to enroll needy children in Medicaid;
- Medicaid funds used to case manage medically fragile patients;
- Medicaid support for school-based clinics.
Had these rules been implemented, New Mexico, which is geographically the fifth largest state in the union and which has the second highest rate of uninsured (right behind Texas) would have lost most of its emergency rooms and its next generation of physicians. Like other low-income regions, its health care system would have been Katrina-ized.
My Excellent Medicaid Rules Adventure
In December of 2007, a small group of New Mexico county health administrators became alarmed by the potential impacts of Bush’s proposed rules changes and asked Senator Jeff Bingaman (D-NM) to step in. After several months of trying, one of his staffers informed me that they just couldn’t muster the votes they needed to block the rules. “The issue is too arcane,” said the staffer. “Nobody understands it. We can’t get any press at all.”
Six of us decided to travel to Washington to do something about it. My five colleagues went to the annual conference of the National Association of Counties to get our colleagues from across the US to lobby their delegations. I embarked on a different kind of mission.
My friends at ePluribus Media formed a research posse, locating an intelligent, award winning-editor at McClatchy they thought might cover the story. They forwarded me information about his various awards and articles and I embarked on a weekly calling campaign to him on the topic of Medicaid Rules. Friends here at Daily Kos like DemFromCT and Jill Richardson (Orangeclouds115) helped me to draw blogging eyes to the story. I sent links to the rec-listed diary to MSM here in NM and to the editor at McClatchy. In DC., while my friends were at the NACo conference, armed only with a camcorder, a laptop, several pens, and a young man to act as my cameraman, I trotted off to Fox News to get videotaped trying to force my way in. While that didn’t pan out, a videographer I met at MyDD named Marty Sonnenburg shot a YouTube video for me, using some of his original footage of Charity Hospital in post-Katrina New Orleans. County health administrators across the country who had never blogged, helped to increase traffic to diaries on the story. McClatchy picked it up in papers throughout the US, as did the NYT and ABC News.
A few weeks after our return, Senator Bingaman gathered enough votes to attach a moratorium on the Bush Rules to the Iraq Spending bill. While I was in DC, a democratic staffer asked me to promote the story to blogs and papers in Iowa. This individual told me it would help to pressure Grassley, who was chair of Senate Appropriations, quietly. Dems in the Senate not want the blogs to call out Grassley by name, or to otherwise alienate him because, I was told, he was the only Senior Republican Senator willing to work with Democrats, and frequently incorporated Democratic ideas into his bills. Grassley was seen as a key to the success of attempts to reform health care.
Grassley, Obama and the IRS
I first met Keith Hearle, president of Verite Consulting, and the author of Grassley’s IRS rules last year at a conference of community organizers and health coalition coordinators. Keith presented his ideas (which had not yet become law) to an ecstatic albeit geeky audience.
In the first weeks of the new administration, Obama posted a set of health care principles on the newly minted website, Whitehouse.gov. Among them, was hospital financing and reporting reform. Like Grassley, Obama realized the health care system could not be fixed unless hospital finances were made transparent. He immediately inserted into the 990H, the form non-profit hospitals use to report to the IRS, a question requiring, for the continuation of non-profit status, a description of the means in which the hospital involved the public in its needs assessment determining “community benefit” (i.e., those moneys non-profit hospitals are required to invest in other community services). Although the new rule had no teeth, Obama was signaling to hospitals the importance of working with community coalitions to develop a health care safety net outside of its own walls.
Grassley took this one step farther and gave the rule teeth. He inserted new IRS reporting rules into HCR for non-profit hospitals that require them to work with community health coalitions to develop needs assessments defining and prioritizing “community benefit” based on actual data. This means that it is now in the best interest of non-profit hospitals to strengthen, contribute to and cooperate with community based health care advocacy groups. They will have to define “charity care” through policy (with the help of broad-based coalitions), and will no longer be able to simply write off bad debt (unpaid and often inflated bills) as charity care or community benefit. Public money that is taken by non-profit hospitals to subsidize the uninsured, and to support the community safety net will actually have to be used for that purpose.
Why the New IRS Rules Strengthen Continuing Reform Efforts
Most Americans have never experienced national health care. They have no point of reference and are thus vulnerable to misinformation campaigns. Our best strategy to create Single Payer, or a strong public/private hybrid that meets our needs, is to allow individual communities to develop their own health care safety nets. We need hospitals, primary care providers, behavioral health specialists and other human service organizations to come together. The game is already lost if the local hospital is not at the table.
Coalitions that are able to successfully coordinate community care become powerful advocates. They are trusted in their communities and sway votes. Fifty to 100 successful community coalitions scattered across the US could change public opinion about health care.
Fortunately, this eventuality is also provided for in the HCR bill. In response to Communities Joined in Action, a coalition of community-based coalitions scattered across the US working to build rational health care infrastructure (that you can join by following the link), Senator Patty Murray (D-WA) and a team of bipartisan Senate and House co-sponsors, inserted a funding stream for coalition-run community care coordination into the HCR bill. In other words, they funded health-related, results-based community organizing.
This bill may not fix everything in our broken health care system. But it creates organizations of people who can mobilize for continuing reform. As for Senator Grassley, he is caught between a rock and a hard place. Teabaggers have threatened to primary him for his cooperation with Democrats and his sensible health care positions. On the other hand, if he swings too far to the right, he cannot win a general election in Iowa. Hence, his simultaneous support of and opposition to HCR; and his clandestine efforts to insert language into the bill he is publicly not supporting.
Like HCR, he may be history.



Just as a point of fact, Arizona is not the fourth-largest state by geographical size. That’s Montana. Arizona is fifth.
Actually, it’s New Mexico that’s fifth. But you’re right that it’s not fourth. I forgot to correct that. Thanks for pointing it out.
Iowa has two excellent senators–Tom Harkin and Charles Grassley, one liberal, one conservative. Put them beside the senators from New York and you will see why Iowa senators more humanely and intelligently represent the United States of America in the U.S. Senate than do the recent run of New York senators.
Lauren, I’m fast becoming a fan of your work. The important lesson: there is always a story behind a story behind a story, and the ‘truth’ is often found after digging, not when succumbing to the emotions at first sight.
Muchas Gracias!
This article got my long-dormant health policy geek juices flowing. Thank you!
Two questions: how big is the IRS stick to be applied to non-profit hospitals who fail to work with community health coalitions on community benefits? And what is the status of for-profit hospitals? Are they required to give back to their communities? How much do they do voluntarily?
The stick is significant. They could lose their non-profit status. For-profit hospitals are not required to give back unless they receive federal dollars to serve the medically indigent. And then, I believe that they are mainly required to provide the indigent care they were paid for, but not necessarily to maintain a community benefit fund. I wouldn’t stake my life on my answer though.
In NM, because counties provide the local match for the federal sole provider hospital moneys, they can make certain requirements a condition of their match. Our two for-profit sole provider hospitals (hospitals that receive Medicaid dollars to serve the indigent) do contribute to a community benefit fund as a condition of the match, I believe. Again, I am not utterly certain.
It is true about the fraud, Medicare, I saw it a few years back, done by some doctors at Georgetown Hospital, DC. The answer :” why do you worry when you do not have to pay it?”. We all had to pay it!
Now I live in France,we all receive the same care and when I was at the hospital near us I had 2 drunken men from UK in my room to the right and a very high class lady at my side. We were treated the same way and the cost: 16 euros per day.
USA the only country without a true health care system, even a small country as Uruguay (run to look in the atlas), last year passed a reform more audacious than the American…
Susana
AmeriChoice Health Taunts DOJ
We all remember the TV show “Roots” could this have been the real inspiration for AmeriChoice Health. The 101 Dumbest Moments In Business 2003 EDITION Whiffed pitch No. 6: blatant stereotyping. By Mark Athitakis April 1, 2003 (Business 2.0)- GRAND PRIZE WINNER, DUMBEST MOMENT OF 2002
In September, insurance company AmeriChoice brings trucks to blighted neighborhoods in New York City and gives away coupons for free chickens as an incentive for the underprivileged to switch their Medicare coverage. New York state senator Carl Kruger files a complaint with the state attorney general. The 101 Dumbest Moments In Business 2003 EDITION – April 1, 2003 Apr 1, 2003 … Just don’t tell him about the “Chinese health balls.” ….. In September, insurance company AmeriChoice brings trucks to blighted … New York state senator Carl Kruger files a complaint with the state attorney general….. Falling on his sword, Welch announces he’ll give up most of the perks,…
2009 and 2010 $120,000 from your tax dollars at work
Philadelphia PA Mayor Nutter received two years in a row $60,000 checks to help keep open and operate the city swimming pools. These checks came from AmeriChoice Health and on the surface seems like fine gifts. Yet, they are Bribes non the less, these checks come from a company who receives all its money from the Federal State Governments as a vendor for Medicare Medicaid services is not allowed to offer bribes kickbacks and money gifts of any kind in order to promote its share of the market place. This is also not allowed as a use of your taxpayers dollars yet it happens.What does it really cost the City of Philadelphia to receive this money? Americhoice Health has a long history of corruption over the years yet seems to be protected by those who are responsible to over see their actions why is that? Sorry must apologize just received a notice that AmeriChoice Health was under the impression they thought they were suppose to have started their very own stimulus and economic program package and the one they implemented, they had no idea it violated all the Stark ,Health and Kickbacks laws. Some one will have to notify the following departments it was all a mistake or error in judgement, the Department of Justice, CMS, Dept of health and Human resourses,the FBI,and IRS, and any other agency effected by this tragedy or unfortunate misunderstanding. No harm, no fowl, forgive and forget, OK, then how about some coupons for a free whole fried chicken…..
Among its provisions, the anti-kickback statute penalizes anyone who knowingly and willfully solicits, receives, offers or pays remuneration in cash or in kind to induce, or in return for: A. Referring an individual to a person for the furnishing, or arranging for the furnishing, of any item or service payable under the Medicare or Medicaid program; or B. Purchasing, leasing or ordering , or arranging for or recommending purchasing, leasing or ordering, any goods, facility, service or item payable under the Medicare or Medicaid program. Violators are subject to criminal penalties, or exclusion from participation in the Medicare and Medicaid rograms, or both. A violation of the anti-kickback law is a felony offense that carries criminal fines of up to $25,000 per violation, imprisonment for up to five years and exclusion from government health care programs.The federal anti-kickback statute, 42 U.S.C.§ 1320a-7b(b), prohibits individuals or entities from knowingly and willfully offering, paying, soliciting or receiving remuneration to induce referrals of items or services covered by Medicare, Medicaid or any other federally funded program.
If this were any one person not a corporation they would be in jail now, if the FBI were called in on this matter they would be in jail now, if the IRS were notified they would be in jail now. Since all Ameri-Choice checks come from the United Health’s home office they should be held equally responsible for any bribes, kickbacks, Stark, Fraud and inducements violations that have occured. Federal and State Governments have developed such a depended position with this company that laws and rules no longer apply for them.This role is nothing new for the AmeriChoice people and its been going on for years, look at some of the prior news articles that date back for years only now they can afford to hire the best of Law firms and give the most for Political contributations all on the back of the taxpayer. Sure the Laws have become tighter but you can still dance away their problems.
Three years ago they were reported to these Federal agency’s and as of todays date not only were they allowed to continue doing business but were never charged once. Protected vendor status sure, politics sure,limited government budgets sure, Federal and State officals looking the other way sure, and rather then stop these activities a strong desire not to rock the boat existed. Even with the vast changes in the laws and budgets,a hands off policy remains, you tell me what’s wrong with this picture? The Government created this monster and now they don’t know what to do about it, like shooting yourself in your own foot etc. Tons of money to advance their national growth, its market positions, tons of money for political donations, tons of money to send 75 millon back to its home office from New York state alone, tons of money to suppot National TV shows, tons of money to pay hugh State fines, tons of money to hire the very best law firms, tons of money to pay for bribes and kickbacks, tons of money for hugh salarys and bonuses, all done on the back of the American taxpayor, you see this company receives all its money from the Federal government. Should your tax dollars be held to a higher standard? Should the government agencys responsible for there review be held to that same standard?Should the IRS audit their corruption? Why has this company not been charged? How long can the buck be passed here in more ways then one? Hey, it’s your tax dollars don’t complain now then don’t complain later.tax dollars for bribes // Oct 6, 2010 at 8:57 am
United Health Group Defrauded 100 Million Americans Posted on January 13th, 2009 by iwaller
An investigation begun by New York’s Attorney General, Andrew Cuomo said the company Ingenix, a research firm owned by UnitedHealth Group deliberately shorted reimbursements on out-of-network health insurance claims for Americans to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars! Ingenix claimed it relied on ‘independent research from across the health care industry’ to determine reimbursement rates. However, UnitedHealth Group and its company Ingenix manipulated the health care claims presented by millions of Americans having health insurance and shorted their reimbursements between 10% and 28% of what the coverage should have paid. Instead, UnitedHealth Group, pocketed the millions of dollars it shorted Americans. UnitedHealth Group provides health benefits to 26 million Americans. Nearly all health care insurance companies in the country were using the same low reimbursement rates. Some of the largest health insurance companies who utilize the same Ingenix system are United Health Care (owned by UnitedHealth Group), Aetna, Cigna, Wellpoint/Empire BlueCross BlueShield and Genix. These companies are currently under investigation in New York suspected of participating in the same reimbursement fraud. How ironic UnitedHealth Group’s mission statement says in part: “We seek to enhance the performance of the health system and improve the overall health and well-being of the people we serve…We work with health care professionals to expand access to high-quality health care so people get the care they need at an affordable price.” Rather than anyone going to jail, UnitedHealth Group settled with the New York Attorney General by agreeing to pay $50 Million as the settlement to be used to establish and create a new database to determine rates for patients who choose physicians outside of the insurance giant’s network. Little good this does for the millions of Americans who were ripped off by these insurance scumbags. “This is a huge scam that affected hundreds of millions of Americans [who were] ripped off by their health insurance companies,” says Cuomo. “This was unethical, and it robbed vulnerable patients of insurance reimbursements they deserved.” Cuomo is now investigating other insurance companies that use Ingenix’s database. There may be millions more on the line as well. Of course, as is the corporate way of the guilty, UnitedHealth Group stated “We respectfully disagree with the New York Attorney General’s findings that we manipulated data … (or that our ownership of Ingenix was a conflict of interest.) We agreed to his settlement because it was an effective way to address any perceived conflict of interest.” The American Medical Association, represented by Dr. Nancy Nielson, president-elect of the AMA stated “there is a profit motive for keeping reimbursement low.” “It is shocking and unacceptable for an insurance company to hide behind a shroud of secrecy”. Nielson also said “It is another example of UnitedHealth playing by its own rules.” This is not the first time UnitedHealth has been involved in legal action. In 2000, the AMA filed a lawsuit in federal court in New York over the exact same reimbursement issues. In May of 2008, Oxford Health Insurance, Inc, a unit of UnitedHealth Group, had to refund $50 million to small business customers in New York to settle claims it overcharged for health insurance policies back in 2006. More trouble from the past, when former CEO, William W. McGuire, M.D. was charged with securities fraud by the SEC. Mr. McGuire ultimately found guilty, had to repay $468 million as a partial settlement of the prosecution. In summary, I am of the opinion that corporate America is as corrupt as anywhere on earth. CEO bilking millions in golden parachutes and executive compensation, while American citizens fund their luxurious lifestyles with hard earn money, simply to be overcharged, cheated and ripped off by the rich and powerful. The UnitedHealth Group scam, is no different that the crooks on Wall Street: AIG, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch, Lehman Brothers, Bear Stearns, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Citigroup, and other corporate manipulators such as Shell Oil, Exxon-Mobile, and so many other financial and energy leading companies. The free market system is over in America, thanks to corporate greed which took its roots during the Reagan trickledown economic philosophy. Corporate America cannot and should not be trusted and the federal government is almost in the same boat. Disdain for hardworking Americans by the Wall Street and Corporate America is so prevalent, they no longer tried to hide. The ‘haves’ continues to increase the divide between the ‘have not’s. Americans, Republicans and Democrats, should be outraged and the raping and pillaging of their money by Corporate America. We must begin to demand a government that works with incorporating fines and bringing to justice those criminals who rob, steal and cheap on a national basis from hard working citizens. None of the men leading these companies have gone to jail. Where is the justice for middle American who pays the bills for these outlaws?
You made a number of nice points there. I did a search on the theme and found most persons will have the same opinion with your blog.
Please visited our site to here…and lets play game Click here
A (bad) joke
Man 1: My dog’s got no nose!
Man 2: How does he smell?
Man 1: Awful!
Man 2: Sssshh .. he might hear you.
Man 1: It’s ok – he doesn’t have any ears either!