From the NACA website, a bank exec who made $50 M in 2007, but refused to help with NACA's campaign

From the NACA website, a bank exec who made $50 M in 2007, but refused to restructure mortgages

Amazing article in my local newspaper about a national phenomenon I had totally missed: a nonprofit out of Massachusetts called NACA (Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America) has been organizing massive mortgage restructuring events across the country.

NACA’s Save the Dream tour has become a nationwide phenomenon, drawing more than 180,000 desperate people this summer to gigs in Cleveland, Chicago, St. Louis and Atlanta – where a 2-mile-long line of people waiting to get in wrapped twice around the Georgia Dome. The pitch: a mobile loan-servicing operation where struggling homeowners can arrive with their paperwork and leave with a more affordable mortgage.

… The NACA events are the largest and most visible sign of how foreclosure activities have become part of the zeitgeist. Just as Hoovervilles and bread lines were emblematic of the Great Depression, foreclosure gatherings may go down in history as the public face of the Great Recession.

They did Los Angeles last weekend and next it’s Phoenix, Vegas and Oakland. Schedule here. If you are having mortgage trouble, don’t miss it. You bring all your paperwork, they scan it in, review it, work out what you can afford and then put you at a table with your mortgage lender rep, who restructures your loan on the spot.

… attendees typically end up with affordable mortgages fixed for 30 years at low interest rates — sometimes as low as 2 percent — and often with a principal balance reduction.

But here’s the most interesting part. When asked how this nonprofit manages to get the banks to do it, Bruce Marks, NACA’s CEO, says:

Obama pleads, begs and bribes the servicers, and that doesn’t work … We don’t trust them, so we force them to do it with nonviolent bank terrorism. We go to CEOs’ homes and hold them personally responsible for the devastation they’re causing. We dump furniture on their lawns; we knock on their front doors.

At the top of NACA’s website there is a string of perp photos: bank executives who have refused to cooperate. Click on a photo and a pop-up shows their portrait with the word PREDATOR across it, alongside the amount they earned the last three years (you know, $50 million a year, that kind of money), their net worth, and their home phone number. They call it their ACCOUNTABILITY CAMPAIGN. This is one combative website and group. They are also hiring over 1,000 new people right now. They are taking 500 employees on their Save The Dream Tour right now. They are organized.

This is the way Michael Lerner might like to organize a community effort on the mortgage crisis (if he had Bruce Marks’ skills) — combatively, on a big scale, referencing what Obama is failing to do by being too nice — though he would be trumpeting a Caring Society angle not the American Dream as his frame. Would he be running photos with PREDATOR I across them? We scrupulously avoid ad hominem attacks in Tikkun, but we strongly criticize people for their public stands on the issues. Isn’t this the latter? Writing PREDATOR across a photo would not be considered nonviolent in many peace circles, but is public shaming wrong? Conflict is necessary to counter injustice and greed. Furniture and angry crowds on financial predators’ lawns is the right way to go if it isn’t physically violent and is in a frame of promoting a caring world.

I can’t help but recall the weak response by Rabbi David Saperstein at the press conference for the religious campaign for health care reform, when he refused to suggest that any Congressperson who voted against universal healthcare was in any way immoral. I wrote him in my post:

But don’t you want to make someone who votes against universal healthcare even a little tiny bit uncomfortable? Did you have to go out of your way to assure them we would not think the worse of them?

NACA has no problem making corporate execs uncomfortable. This is interesting, because NACA itself seems so much more in the corporate style than most nonprofits.

For Bay Area readers, don’t miss another local angle in the story, about

… Mwanza Furaha of Lagunitas, who got involved with a foreclosure support group run by Marin Family Action called Don’t Get Mad, Get Even. Furaha, a longtime R&B singer who is fighting foreclosure of the home she and her husband own in western Marin County, decided to bring her music background to bear in the foreclosure battle. She’s acting as both an impresario and onstage performer for Marinstock, a daylong benefit concert for families struggling to hold onto their homes, being held Saturday in Novato at the amphitheater at the old Hamilton Air Force Base.

marinstocklogoinfo

This sounds great. Good for them! But what a difference, after the in-your-face move-move-move NACA website to visit Marin Family’s Actions decorous site. I don’t see the words “Don’t Get Mad Get Even” anywhere on the home page. It takes me a while to realize that the nice drawing of birds roosting on a guitar at top right is advertising a hard hitting benefit concert. I’m sure it’s a matter partly of money or volunteer time for website creation, but it’s also indicative to me of a niceness that infects so many nonprofits, and especially, I am sad to say, the ones with any kind of spiritual consciousness (I don’t know if that refers to Marin Family Action, I mean the whole world inhabited by liberal spiritual seekers).

Gandhi and MLK would be going for nonviolent bank terrorism if they were with us today, don’t you think?


Bookmark and Share