The Answer to the Question
by: Peter Marmorek on September 9th, 2009 | 6 Comments »
It is the middle of July, and I am carefully layering sheets of pure gold over the statue of Saraswati that will sit in the centre of my altar. It is a finicky task, and while I’m trying focus my concentration, I suddenly notice a question flashing through my mind: what’s a good Jewish boy doing gilding a Hindu goddess for a Pagan altar?
I was raised as a Jew, and phonetically memorized enough Hebrew to stumble through a Bar Mitzvah. But I was never part of a Jewish community, and as I never understood Hebrew, the times when my parents dragged me to a synagogue were leaden painful hours, an experience to be dutifully endured rather than anything that opened onto a spiritual path. For twenty years I would assert that I wasn’t Jewish, because I didn’t believe in any of the theology, and it wasn’t until I found myself teaching a World Religions course, doing research on what Jews believe, that I realised how much of the ethical framework which I embraced was Jewish. My wife (non-Jewish) would listen tolerantly to my convoluted explanation of why I wasn’t Jewish, and laugh and say, “Oh, Peter, of course you’re Jewish.” Reluctantly, slowly, eventually, I came to admit she was probably right.
But as the Firesign Theatre says, “There’s a seeker born every minute,” and being Jewish left me still seeking a spiritual practice. Of course, being a World Religions teacher was a good vantage point from which to explore. I learned more about different religions and found much of value and many similarities in each of them. But though I read a lot, nothing seemed to change in my life. As Baba Ram Dass says in Be Here Now, “Painted cakes do not satisfy hunger.” Readings aren’t a spiritual practice. I was drawn enough to Taoism and its teachings to visit a Taoist temple, but the practice there was to memorize Chinese syllables and chant them without awareness of their meaning, and if I’d wanted that I’d have stayed in a synagogue.
Then the friend of a friend called me, or the Great Mystery gave me a nudge: at this point I wouldn’t claim to be able to distinguish between the two. But I found myself in a sweat lodge, on a vision quest, and something shifted.
Part of the shift was that the Native American path works through body, and as that was the area of myself I least inhabited, it was the place I was most open to learning. Part was moving to a perspective on religion I would later find best encapsulated in William James’ depiction that religion “consists of the belief that there is an unseen order and our supreme good lies in harmoniously adjusting ourselves thereto.”
By that description a religion is a catalyst, a technique to help me align myself with that unseen power, the implicate truth in the universe. What matters isn’t the Truth, but the efficacy of the religion. The genealogy of the powers I call in for the pipe prayers starts with Great-Grandmother, the Void, Great-Grandfather, the Galaxy of Stars. Do I believe in them as literal conscious entities? No. Do I find them useful to triangulate and orient my personal experience in relationship to the world? Absolutely!
The particular path I follow is called the Twisted Hairs, as it is an inter-tribal tradition, reputed to have been braided together by shamanic teachers from different north, central and south American tribes. Practitioners are encouraged to continue the braiding, finding the truths in different religions, and the images of those truths that work for them.
Last spring I gave a dear friend the statue that had been in the centre of my altar for a number of years, a dancing Nataraj that represents the aspect of Shiva as the Transformer, who changes life into death, and creates new life out of death. Having a space at the centre of my altar, the physical set of symbols that represent earth / air / fire / water or body / mind / spirit / emotion was a powerful emptiness, and I held to it, waiting to see what would come to fill it. As I move into my sixties, Shiva didn’t feel as right for me as he had a decade ago. So I wandered eventually down to Gerrard Street in Toronto’s “Little India”, where a handful of stores focussing on religious iconography nestle between sari merchants, and the wonderful restaurants that had first pulled me there years ago.
I looked at the shelves, grateful for the classes I’d spent teaching about the different gods, or the different faces and aspects of the one God, for Hinduism is a religion of which it is said that it has 330 million gods, and that it has only one god, and both are true statements. And I was grateful to have been gifted with the opportunity to spend time in the temples of India and Nepal, so that the images carried emotion and spirit rather than just being more painted cakes. In the end it was Saraswati who called me. She is the goddess of consciousness, the arts and education, and enlightenment. So as a symbol for my aspirations, I didn’t feel I could do better.
The statue is about three inches tall, and bronze. But there is a tradition in Hindu and Buddhist countries in Asia of covering images that represent aspects of the divine in gold, and the idea of doing that pleased me: it was a way of adding a personal component, of deepening and enriching the symbol. In all primal religons, intent is the key element and so my intent to manifest Saraswati in my life could be incarnated by covering her in clothes of gold.
I don’t believe humans are capable of understanding or knowing the ultimate truths of the universe. But we are not just mind, we are spirit as well, and spirit is like a magnet, which feels the power of the pull of north and aligns itself to it. So I trust the pull of spirit and these steps on this strange syncretic path I have assembled, gifts of birth, of learning, of fate. I can’t make it fit a Procrustean bed of truth or falsity, but for me it has meaning. It helps me to better understand myself and my life, and to find ways that the two might fit together slightly more harmoniously. And if that isn’t a final ultimate answer, it is enough of an answer for me, for now.



I find this marvelous. You found what spoke to you and moved you. I loved the phrase about your body “the area of myself I least inhabited.” Modern man in search of something that isn’t a belief so much as an experience, mediated by images from religions and your own imagination.
Peter, What a wonderful little essay. Just like David, I want to say that your point about how Native American spirituality works through the body, “the area of yourself that you least inhabited and therefore the most open to learning,” resonated with me. I am most unconscious in my body, but although I agree with you, I also know that it is the repository of my most important knowings. It’s the least affected by cultural understandings, and therefore most open to learning, but it also already contains the deepest wisdom I have accumulated. It’s just the most difficult to access.
Thanks for the comments, and as both focussed on the line about body, I’ll expand a bit.
The image that my teacherhttp://oriah.org used is that we access the world through mind, spirit, emotion, and body. For almost all of us, there’s one area we use. (Which doesn’t mean we’re good at it or bad at the others: my wife approaches the world through emotion- she’ll feel that something is wrong before she knows what it is. But she’s very smart, it’s just that mind isn’t where she works from. If you listen to current talk radio, you hear many folks who approach the world through mind, and aren’t very good at it…it’s just their modality.)
Just as we have one direction we’re best at, we have one we’re weakest in, and the tendency is to ignore that direction (image: the mentally retarded child who lives in the attic at the top of the stairs that no one in the family ever talks about.) But you can’t go any faster than your slowest part, so that’s the place to go and do work.
As opposed to all those books I kept on reading – no prizes for guessing which direction I live in. (I guess the fact that I’m writing this from the Kripalu yoga center on my laptop is another clue. And when I wandered into a session of devotional ecstatic chanting last night, the first thing I heard was a song of praise to Saraswati, the goddess whom I gilded above.
Marmorek’s easy slipping back and forth among Indian religions, Hindu and Native American, that have nothing to do with one another suggests strongly what his depth in either is.
He in effect confesses that the real barrier to his ever getting serious about Judaism was that he was too lazy to learn more than a mumble or two of Hebrew. One wonders what his interest in the two Indian religions would be if he had to learn Sanskrit or Arapahoe to practice them.
Suggesting that these religions have nothing to do with each other is a weak place to stand when launching invective. Laziness had nothing to learn with my lack of Hebrew, as a closer reading (” I was never part of a Jewish community”) might have suggested…the town in which had lived had four Jewish families.
Teaching World Religions for 25 years certainly gave me some knowledge. It’s experience and practice that gave me such as depth as I have… I’m impressed that Jack can evaluate it without knowing anything about it. That’s a depth of insight to which I wouldn’t even aspire.
A pal urged me to look at this website, great post, fanstatic read… keep up the cool work!