Tikkun Daily button

Archive for July, 2009



“These things are old”

Jul2

by: on July 2nd, 2009 | 1 Comment »

lockup_WEB-SCREEN_small2I am delighted to introduce The Immanent Frame and its diverse lineup of contributors to the readers of the Tikkun Daily Blog. As a collective blog publishing interdisciplinary perspectives on secularism, religion, and the public sphere, we serve as a forum for ongoing exchanges among leading scholars across the social sciences and humanities, and feature original essays about controversial issues, major new books, and world events. As managing editor of The Immanent Frame, I will be posting regularly in this space, and on behalf of our entire editorial team and our many contributors, I sincerely hope you will follow and participate in our conversations, both here and at The Immanent Frame.

Most recently, contributors to The Immanent Frame have been engaged in an extended discussion about President Barack Obama, civic virtues, and the common good, called “These things are old.” Drawing on Obama’s complex and powerful political rhetoric – including the Inaugural Address from which this series title was drawn – our contributors have sought to trace his values back to the historical and philosophical traditions from which they are drawn.


Read more...

The Israel Lobby: Now a “Sliver” of U.S. Jews?

Jul2

by: on July 2nd, 2009 | 3 Comments »

Interesting post here on Mondoweiss. Finally the Israel Lobby has reason to worry? We’ll wait and see.

The Independence of Jewish Voices

Jul2

by: on July 2nd, 2009 | Comments Off

What I look like on Shabbat & Holy Days

What I look like on Shabbat & Holy Days

The Independence of Jewish Voices

Independent Jewish Voices of Canada (IJV) is a Canadian organisation formed to disagree with Canada’s three primary Jewish communal agencies. This is an important development and one that Canada’s organised Jewish community had better learn to contend with, something it has not yet done. The Canadian Jewish Congress has, in fact, denied IJV any status in Congress. That is, in my opinion, a foolish decision and one that will ultimately damage Congress more than it does IJV.
The question for me, however, is how “independent” IJV can be when it is over-run by a cadre of new leftists. I have become close to one of IJV’s organisers but remain uncertain of whether or not there is a place for me. Israel Apartheid posters were in profusion at the annual general meeting I attended, a calumny that I find offensive, ignorant, and bereft of any authentic notion of Jewish identity. Books on Israel as a racist state were for sale at a table set up in the hallway. IJV passed a resolution, with 95% support, calling on divestment from Israel. Sheer madness!
So why was I in full Chasidic regalia among a group I hold in contempt?
Well… because they are Jews. That’s precisely the same motivation I use to attend Unitarian Universalist churches. There are Jews there. The Jewish religious leader who is afraid to encounter Jews where they affiliate is leading with one eye closed. I already need bifocals. Closing one eye would be a tragedy. This brings to mind the statement attributed to Rabbi Sholom Ber of Lubavitch (who is actually quoting a well-known maxim) “We have a strong eye to see the good in others and a weak eye to see the evil in ourselves”. This notion is reinforced by Jewish tradition.
Mishna Pirqei Avot (4:3) states <i>Do not degrade another,and do not be generally opposed “on principle”; there is for you no one without a reason and neither thing nor word without a place in your life.</i> The Mishna is an attempt to restore traditional memory, which I’ll discuss at length in another post. Pirqei Avot is The Mishna’s collection of ethical guidelines.
The traditional memory of Judaism, it seems to me, is largely lost to IJV. That’s not a strong criticism — the traditional memory of Judaism is lost to most Jews — but IJV’s acceptance of biased and poisoned rhetoric submerges the Jewish voice so completely that I wonder if IJV is appropriately named: where, precisely, is the Jewish voice? The Mishna compels me to accept that IJV has a place. Sholom Ber asks me to see the good. I see the place. I see the good. But what voice I hear hasn’t got a Jewish accent.
The voices that <i> do<i> speak with a Jewish accent do <i>not</i>, however, speak to me. The Council for Israel and Jewish Advocacy (CIJA) is the lead Jewish communal agency in Canada. The linkage of Israel advocacy and Jewish advocacy is, to me, highly inappropriate. Jewish advocacy is my job and the job of any rabbi or educator.
I once told the Israeli consul in Montreal that his job is to demystify Israel to non-Jews and my job is to demystify Judaism — to both Jews and non-Jews. Israel advocacy is best left to Israel, which has a network of shlukhim (representatives) assigned to both small-community synagogues and the Jewish National Fund, various Israel Bond agents, a trade commissioner, two consuls, and an ambassador in Canada. If there is something not working in this network that issue is Israel’s, not the Canadian Jewish community’s.
IJV’s dissent from the Canadian Jewish communal norm is no reason to deny it access to the “official” community. The idea that there is a single Jewish voice in Canada troubles me and is the reason I have begun the Jewish Courts for Social Justice, a Beth Din (Jewish court) in Ottawa that will concern itself with social policy and social justice issues. Congress has long had this role but has always spoken with a secular voice. The Beth Din will speak with a Jewish, religious, and progressive voice.
The Jewish sage Hillel counseled “Do not separate yourself from the community. Do not be certain of yourself until the day of your death. Do not judge someone unless you have stood in his (her) place.” Both IJV and Canadian Jewish Congress should heed this advice.

Independent Jewish Voices of Canada (IJV) is a Canadian organisation formed to disagree with Canada’s three primary Jewish communal agencies. This is an important development and one that Canada’s organised Jewish community had better learn to contend with, something it has not yet done.

Read more...

Thank Those Who Refused to Torture

Jul1

by: on July 1st, 2009 | 2 Comments »

Mark Fallon

Mark Fallon

Deputy Commander Mark Fallon objected to the interrogation techniques used at Guantanamo, and raised concerns through NCIS leadership. He refused to participate in the torture of detainees, and made continued efforts to urge Pentagon decision-makers to reconsider more effective and humane interrogation techniques. His concerns, vis-à-vis NCIS Director David Brant, eventually reached Alberto Mora, who took up the issue at the Pentagon.

Check out these stories from Gitmo and sign the letter of commendation to be sent to these brave people in time for July 4 delivery.


Border Crossing Revisited

Jul1

by: on July 1st, 2009 | 2 Comments »

Over the last several years–six to be exact–lots of groups and individuals have come our way in order to experience something of life here in Brazil. We’ve received everything from local church youth groups, to seminary interns, to pilgrims on a journey to “holy sites” on the margins.

It’s interesting that almost all of these folks/groups share certain features, such as:

#1) They have a deep desire to connect with and serve others beyond the borders of the own country.
#2) They are committed to #1 because of their commitment to and relationship with Jesus.
#3) They understand #1 and #2 to be part and parcel of something called Christian mission.

#4) They have a sense that commitment to #3 (Christian mission) is part of what it means to be a faithful Christian, yet #3 involves a complex history that weaves faithfulness with much UNFAITHFULNESS.
#5) They want #1 without the problems of #4.

What we hear a lot goes something like this:

“People everywhere (and U.S. Christians, especially) are hungry to get to know their brothers and sisters in other places. We want to relate to Christians “across the borders” because we believe that we belong together. But here’s the thing: It has got to be more than a one-way, top-down, us-to-them attempt to share some of what we have, or to do something for them based on what we think their needs are.”

In a nutshell, what we hear from our friends who come to Brazil is that Christian mission has to be reimagined and performed differently that the (neo) colonial paradigm–even in its most benevolent forms. There’s a growing sense that it’s just not

Read more...

The “Eco” of My Ecofeminism

Jul1

by: on July 1st, 2009 | 10 Comments »

I want to introduce myself to you in a bioregional way, because as a Wiccan, the land that I live on and relate to and love constitutes a large part of my life. This is the “eco” part of my ecofeminism. Tomorrow or the next day, I’ll introduce the feminist part.

Last Monday was a “mink day.” When my husband Mark went out in the morning, he told me he’d seen a weasel of some sort in the garden. So as I ate breakfast, I checked our field guide to North American mammals and kept my eyes peeled to catch a glimpse of it.

Sure enough, about ten minutes later, I saw a large weasel-like animal crawling through the foliage at the edge of the lake. It was carrying something in its mouth, and at first I thought it might have caught “my chipmunk,” the one that eats out of my hand. But soon thereafter, the mink – for that’s what it was – returned with another small, furry animal in its mouth, and I realized it must be moving its young to a new den. In all, I saw Mama Mink move at least three of her offspring across our yard and into a nearby park.

What a thrill! I’d never seen a wild mink before, although I knew that in the past they had lived on the shores of Lake Mendota. A neighbor I’ll call Dick, whose family owned the original homestead on this land, told us about them when we first moved to the lake 6 ½ years ago. Part of Dick’s mink story was reported in the Wisconsin State Journal in the 1930s. At that time, his father wooed his mother by giving her a stole from two minks he’d trapped on his own land. In the 1950s Dick followed suit by catching a mink in our neighborhood and then buying a second pelt to have a wrap made for his prospective wife. When I called her to let her know of my mink sighting, she admitted that she’d felt ambivalent about Dick’s earlier gift and promised that he wouldn’t set any traps for the mink I just saw.

Read more...

Opening Day

Jul1

by: on July 1st, 2009 | 1 Comment »

Rabbi Michael Lerner, Editor of Tikkun, is recovering well from his cancer surgery.

Rabbi Michael Lerner, Editor of Tikkun, is recovering well from his cancer surgery.






Congratulations on getting to read the very first day of Tikkun Daily!

Do you know what Tikkun really stands for? Have you read our Core Vision at www.tikkun.org?

(Caryl) Churchill & The Jews

Jul1

by: on July 1st, 2009 | 3 Comments »

A Scale Map of the Middle East

A Scale Map of the Middle East

A Scale Map of the Middle East

A Scale Map of the Middle East

Salaam & Shalom Look A Lot Alike

Salaam & Shalom Look A Lot Alike

I am a rabbi, I debuted Caryl Churchill’s play Seven Jewish Children (7JC for short) in Canada , and so let us please not have any nonsense about 7JC being anti-Semitic – unless you want to dare suggest that I am an anti-Semite? Caryl Churchill is a playwright based in the United Kingdom. She appropriates the Jewish voice for her play, and in my correspondence with her I have told her that she didn’t succeed at it that well. I appreciate the risk that went into her artistic conceit, an artistic conceit that is not anti-Semitic. You would have to make a case for the Torah being an anti-Semitic document to suggest so. Tzedeq! Tzedeq tirdof! shouts the Torah — “Justice! Pursue justice!” We are not told Tzedeq tirdof le’am “pursue justice in the nation”. There is no qualification given. We are also told (Exodus 23:9) “And the stranger? There should be no oppression. You well know how strangers were treated in Egypt.” There is, in other words, a Jewish imperative to accept “the Other”.

Seven Jewish Children is a series of seven monologues. It is a one-sided and culturally ignorant portrayal of how a Gentile thinks Jews might speak about the problematics of Jewish history. The play presents Jewish parents speaking among themselves, their friends, and their own parents. The adults speak about their children but never to them. The play is monotypical: it portrays Jewish voices in one way – frightened, defiant, strident, and finally, at the end, uncaring. The play is problematic thematically. It is also remarkable because it tries to impose the Other from within a Jewish voice.
Churchill’s appropriation of an unreal Jewish voice is a dilemma from a real Jewish perspective. The Jewish voice has become, for most middle-class secular Jews, so far submerged into the Other that the Jewish quality disappears entirely. I oft-encounter Jewish university students, all of them white, for whom Israel and the Holocaust are what Rabbi Arthur Hertzberg, of blessed memory, criticised as twin pillars of Jewish identity. It’s ironic when you consider that these students who strongly identify with Israel can’t read or speak a word of Hebrew. Neither do they have any idea about even the rudiments of Jewish history or culture, never mind religion. This contrasts to the Palestinian Arab students I encounter, who are not usually white (though a few are), who are fluent in Arabic, and who have strong cultural attachments even if they are not particularly observant as Muslims or Christians. The dilemma of the modern secular Jew is being the Other. Morton Weinfeld, an academic and sociologist at McGill University in Montreal identifies this as “just like everyone else – but different”.
In my first post I identified myself as the great-great grandson of a Polish Chasidic rebbe and the great-great-great grandson of a Turkish rabbi. The tensions of being a progressive Chasid from a Sefardic background allowed me to lend truly authentic inflections to the inauthentic voices Churchill writes in Seven Jewish Children. The play has been (correctly) denounced as one-sided – as if playwrights are under any obligation to write balanced perspectives in their plays? Shirley Jackson’s “The Lottery”, perhaps the most remarkable American short story written in the 20th century, is also one-sided. It became a classic in spite of this, and Ms Jackson’s art was quite misunderstood in its day. Caryl Churchill’s play is not destined to be a classic. It is a remarkable artistic statement for all its faults.
I was recently seriously unsettled by the strident ignorance of a young Alpha male, a seriously by the book left-liberal who was, I later discovered, originally a conventional Jew-as-Other who went on Birthright, a programmed trip to Israel that attempts to create connections between Israel and Diaspora Jews. He now promotes Israel Apartheid Week on a Canadian university campus. Young Alpha represents perfectly the submergence of the Jewish voice deep into Other. This encounter occurred at the annual general meeting of Independent Jewish Voices (IJV), which was held in Ottawa. IJV formed to provide a progressive Jewish voice to counter Canada’s primary Jewish communal organisation, the Council for Israel and Jewish Advocacy. I was there on erev Shabbat (Friday evening) to hear the parents of Rachel Corrie and also went Saturday evening, intending to do Havdala (the prayer formally ending the Sabbath) for them and also to see how they portrayed the voices in 7JC. Havdala was cancelled. I did not stay to hear their portrayal of 7JC, largely because I did not feel wanted. I have since come to other understandings, which I will post on shortly.
Young Alpha feels free to post far-left agit-prop on the Potlucks for Peace listserv but does not feel free to accept criticism for using a listserv designed for a Jewish/Palestine dialogue group. Dialogue is of no use to anyone – we need action! Who am I to argue? Jewish tradition agrees: “The main point is not study: rather, it is action!” (Pirqei Avot 1:17). Two important qualifications are attached to this remark, whose author asserts [1] “I was raised among the sagacious greats” (he had spent his life learning in the Jewish academies of Roman Israel) and [2] “Too much talk leads to sin”. Talk does not lead to inaction – it leads to transgressive behaviour!
Seven Jewish Children accurately portrays the devolution of one Jewish family to transgressive behaviour – can anyone really assert that transgression evolves? The increasing complexity of an urbanised and scientistic society leads, I think, to decreased spiritual complexity over time. This speaks as much to the secular progressive rejection of spiritually progressive Jews as it does to the journey of Jews from oppressed to oppressor.

I am a rabbi, I debuted Caryl Churchill‘s play Seven Jewish Children (7JC for short) in Canada , and so let us please not have any nonsense about 7JC being anti-Semitic – unless you want to dare suggest that I am an anti-Semite? Caryl Churchill is a playwright based in the United Kingdom. She appropriates the Jewish voice for her play, and in my correspondence with her I have told her that she didn’t succeed at it that well. I appreciate the risk that went into her artistic conceit, an artistic conceit that is not anti-Semitic. You would have to make a case for the Torah being an anti-Semitic document to suggest so.

Read more...