Statism and Anti-Statism: Reflections on Israel’s Legitimacy Crisis
In 1915, the young Gershom Scholem, already a passionate Zionist and rebel against the assimilationist German Jewish bourgeoisie, wrote the following lines, certain to shock American Zionist ears in 2012:
[Herzl’s] only thought was: the Jewish State. And that we reject. For we preach anarchism. That is, we do not want a State, but rather a free society…. We as Jews know enough of the dreadful idolatry of the State … to pray to it and to offer it our children as a willing sacrifice to its unquenchable greed and lust for power. We Jews are no Staatsvolk.
I begin with these lines from Scholem as a way of putting into perspective the current campaign to combat the “delegitimization of the State of Israel.” Much of the political activity of the world Jewish community today is being devoted to this campaign, with efforts conducted by a large range of actors, including the Israeli diplomatic corps, nongovernmental Jewish organizations, and even student activists on college campuses. What these efforts seem to ignore, however, is the extent to which the question of the “legitimacy of the state” has long been the subject of intra-Jewish, and even intra-Zionist, contestation—contestation that has only intensified over the past generation.
Indeed, much of the recent political turbulence in Israel may be understood as consisting of a broad array of challenges to the legitimacy of the state. Such challenges come from diverse social sectors, each of which is also sharply divided by conflicting attitudes toward the state. American Jews concerned with Israel need to consider the meaning of solidarity with “Israel” or even “Zionism” in view of the current turbulence. In today’s Israeli political culture, opposition to the state takes a wide variety of forms, ranging from principled anti-statism to rejection of the state in its current form on diverse grounds. A review of some of the recent turbulence can serve to highlight the breadth of this phenomenon, which has recently given rise to high-profile manifestations across the Israeli religious and political spectrum.
A Perennial Debate Among Zionists
Before proceeding to that review, it is important to note briefly that the statism/anti-statism opposition has been a flashpoint of intra-Zionist contestation from the earliest phases of the movement. There is even a well-known Hebrew term for statism: mamlachtiyut, which richly evokes this perennial theme of polemics for those familiar with Zionist history. The term is most frequently associated with David Ben-Gurion and his contested view that the establishment of the State of Israel signified a break with Zionism as a non-state political/cultural/religious movement. Mamlachtiyut was advanced as the opposite of tenu’atiyut (movement-ism) or miflagtiyut (party-ism).
How to Read the Rest of This Article
The text above was just an excerpt. The full web versions of our print articles are now hosted by Duke University Press, Tikkun‘s publisher. Click here to read an HTML version of the article. Click here to read a PDF version of the article.
(To return to the Summer 2012 Table of Contents, click here.)
Berman, Nathaniel. 2012. Statism and Anti-Statism: Reflections on Israel’s Legitimacy Crisis. Tikkun 27(3): 31.