Tikkun Magazine



Moving Beyond the One-State/Two-State Debate

The current Israeli government has no interest in any plausible version of a two-state solution. The current government also has no intention whatsoever of affirming equal citizenship of the Arab inhabitants of the West Bank within the overall Israeli control system. So what now?

The inclusion of Isaac Herzog in a unity government would not have altered Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s interest in the perpetuation of the current state of affairs, which can best be described as either indefinite occupation or a system tending toward apartheid. Neither is acceptable either morally or in current international law.

I agree with Michael Lerner’s creative proposal in this issue of Tikkun: the notion that liberal and progressive Jews should continue to imagine and support both a viable two-state solution and an egalitarian one within the territorial boundaries of the current control system, the old Palestinian Mandate. There is no need to make a definitive choice between them. Though both outcomes are unlikely in the short or middle term, both remain within the realm of possibility. Depending on the nature of the solutions, either could be just, and there is no moral reason why a larger state of all its citizens would be preferable to two smaller states.

In their best versions, the two-state and one-state solutions could be seen as converging in some form of federal association of two peoples within the larger territory, as Hannah Arendt once proposed. To overcome doubts about the one-state, majoritarian solution, it is desirable to think of the one-state arrangement once again as a federal system that would involve a high degree of autonomy for both peoples, as in the UN Special Committee Minority Proposal of 1947. Conversely, to overcome doubts about the viability of the two-state solution, it would be important to revive, at the very least, the UN General Assembly’s Partition Plan for an economic union that could become the foundation for some form of political federation as well.

{{{subscriber}}}

How to Read the Rest of This Article

The text above was just an excerpt. The web versions of our print articles are now hosted by Duke University Press, Tikkun‘s publisher. Click here to read an HTML version of the article. Click here to read a PDF version of the article.
(To return to the Fall 2015 Table of Contents, click here.)

Andrew Arato is the D. Hirshon Professor in Political and Social Theory at the New School for Social Research.
 

Source Citation

Arato, Andrew. 2015. Moving Beyond the One-State/Two-State Debate. Tikkun 30(4): 31.

tags: Israel/Palestine   
http://www.tikkun.org/nextgen/moving-beyond-the-one-statetwo-state-debate