Liberalism and the Left

How should we conceive of the state of the American Left in the wake of the evisceration of collective bargaining rights in Wisconsin, the sequester and shutdown in Washington, corporate education reform efforts, and the ominous talk of Democratic capitulations to chained Consumer Price Index reforms of the Social Security system?

Woman working on a sewing shop

Women work at a WPA sewing shop in New York. Was the creation of the Works Progress Administration a long-term success or defeat for the U.S. Left?. Credit: Creative Commons/U.S. National Archives and Records Administration.

I’d like to share my own perspective on this debate, a perspective rooted in my experience as a writer and activist born after the fall of the Berlin Wall. Leftists in my generation—younger participants in the lively intellectual culture that has taken root around and beyond Occupy Wall Street in New York City and the new radical journals (n+1, The New Inquiry, Jacobin, and the revitalized Dissent)—accept the need to work for the preservation of the United States’ social welfare architecture, while also setting our sights firmly on revolutionary ends.

In other words, the emerging younger Left may be the least credulous of any in U.S. history in regard to the potential gains to be achieved by working within the system of normal politics. The one exception might be found in the labor movement, where radical young organizers with the Service Employees International Union and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees begrudgingly live with the unions’ proximity to the Democratic Party, but overall the mood is one of comprehensive disgust with liberalism, whether preceded by “neo” or not.

As a result of this impatience with liberal politics, the younger Left is unlikely to find Eli Zaretksy’s account of the socialist character of the New Deal project convincing. By the same token, our awareness of ever-increasing inequalities tends to make us skeptical about James Livingston’s arguments that the Left has been steadily accumulating victories.

In the face of this “neither/nor” response to the conventional debate, some of us have been turning to the study of American Left intellectual history. There are yet lessons to be learned from the last generation of Left intellectuals who thought seriously about revolutionary socialism. Reflecting on the ideas of one such figure, the historian Martin Sklar, may prove useful in escaping the false alternative of Zaretsky vs. Livingston.

Martin Sklar’s Corporate Liberalism Thesis

Sklar is best known as the originator of the “corporate liberalism” thesis, which he first articulated during the Kennedy-Johnson years. Nowadays, the phrase “corporate liberalism” likely strikes readers’ ears as a good first step. In the 1960s, however, especially as picked up by New Left historians Gabriel Kolko and James Weinstein, the term was derogatory in two ways.

...

{{{subscriber}}}
The rest of this article is only available to subscribers and NSP members -- subscribe or join now to read the rest! We sent an email and postcard to all current members and subscribers explaining how to register for our members-only area. If you remember the username and password you created for Tikkun, click on the blue “log in” link below. If you’re already registered but have forgotten your user ID or password, go to www.tikkun.org/forgot for automated instant assistance. If you are a member or subscriber who still needs to register, email miriam@tikkun.org or call 510-644-1200 for help -- registration is easy and you only have to do it once.

Tim Barker is a writer who lives in New York City.
 

Source Citation

Barker, Tim. 2014. Tikkun 29(2):49.

tags: Politics & Society, US Politics   
Tip Jar Email Bookmark and Share RSS Print
Get Tikkun by Email -- FREE

COMMENT POLICY Please read our comment policy in full here which requests civility and sticking to the topic. We reserve the right to remove any comment for any reason.

One Response to Liberalism and the Left

  1. DHFabian April 23, 2014 at 9:48 pm

    “…work for the preservation of the United States’ social welfare architecture…” Huh? The US shipped out a huge portion of our working class jobs since the 1980s, and Clinton ended welfare in the 1990s. The last welfare check was issued in 1996. What we had always called welfare – General Assistance and AFDC – is long gone. Not everyone can work, due to health or circumstances, and there simply aren’t jobs for all who need one NOW. Liberals responded to Clinton’s neoliberal agenda by raising the Middle Class Only banner. Our leading social service agency today is the dept. of prisons. There is no aid for the very poor. With the latest budget, Dems voted with Republicans to cut food stamps to the elderly, disabled and working poor. Again. The media marketed to libs has virtually censored out poverty since the Clinton administration, which might be why so many Americans are utterly clueless about US poverty today.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*